Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 9.95.002 (2026)
Board considered parole board
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The indeterminate sentence review board, in fulfilling its duties under the provisions of chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess., shall be considered a parole board as that concept was treated in law under the state's indeterminate sentencing statutes.
Notes:
Intent—Severability—Effective dates—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12: See notes following RCW 71.09.250.
Application—2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 ss 301-363: See note following RCW 9.94A.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: Dallin Fort v. State of Washington, 41 F.4th 1141 (9th Cir. 2022).
Dallin Fort v. State of Washington, 41 F.4th 1141 (9th Cir. 2022). “See Wash. Rev. Code §§ 9.95.002 ; 9.95.003. The Review Board is tasked with reviewing the sentences of convicted sex offenders to determine whether the offenders should be released on parole.”
Fagaautau v. Bennett (W.D. Wash. 2024). “Fagaautau to the jurisdiction of a board operating as a parole 15 board, under RCW 9.95.002. However, the legislature intends to conform to the sentencing reform act chapter 9.”
Southard v. Bennett (W.D. Wash. 2024). “Southard to the jurisdiction of a board operating as a parole board, 14 under RCW 9.95.002. However, the legislature intends to conform to the sentencing reform act chapter 9.”
Carr v. Bennett (W.D. Wash. 2024). “Carr to the jurisdiction of a 6 board operating as a parole board, under RCW 9.95.002. However, the legislature intends to conform to the sentencing reform act 7 chapter 9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.