Wash. Rev. Code » Title 90 · Chapter 90.03

Wash. Rev. Code § 90.03.200

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon the court's determination of all issues, the court shall issue a final decree and provide notice of the decree to all parties. The final decree must order each party whose rights have been confirmed, except the United States or an Indian tribe under 43 U.S.C. Sec. 666, to pay the department the fees required by RCW 90.03.470(10) and any other applicable fee schedule within ninety days after the department sends notice to the party under RCW 90.03.240. Appellate review of the decree shall be in the same manner as in other cases in equity, except that review must be sought within sixty days from the entry thereof.
[ 2009 c 332 s 13; 1988 c 202 s 91; 1987 c 109 s 79; 1971 c 81 s 176; 1917 c 117 s 23; RRS s 7373. Formerly RCW 90.12.100.]

Notes:

Application—2009 c 332: See note following RCW 90.03.110.
Severability—1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.
Purpose—Short title—Construction—Rules—Severability—Captions—1987 c 109: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2021 · leading case: Department of Ecology v. Grimes
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Department of Ecology v. Grimes (1993) wash · cites it 3× “Grimes (Grimeses) appeal from a decree adjudicating water rights pursuant to RCW 90.03.200 entered by the Pend Oreille County Superior Court.”
Department of Ecology v. Acquavella (2002) washctapp · cites it 2× “RCW 90.03.200. See also 7 Wash. State Bar Ass’n, Real Property Deskbook § 117.”
State, Dept. of Ecology v. Acquavella (2002) washctapp · cites it 2× “RCW 90.03.200. See also VII WASH. STATE BAR ASS'N, REAL PROPERTY DESKBOOK § 117.”
Dep't of Ecology v. Acquavella (2021) wash “The Yakama Nation and the United States provide multiple arguments as to why AID should be prevented from opening the headgates outside of irrigation season, we discuss each in turn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.