Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.175 (2026)
Rules and regulations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The shorelines hearings board may adopt rules and regulations governing the administrative practice and procedure in and before the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1995–2009 · leading case: Union Bay Pres. Coalition v. Cosmos Dev. & Admin. Corp., 127 Wash. 2d 614 (Wash. 1995).
Union Bay Pres. Coalition v. Cosmos Dev. & Admin. Corp., 127 Wash. 2d 614 (Wash. 1995). “RCW 90.58.175; see also RCW 34.05.001 ("The legislature intends that to the greatest extent possible and unless this chapter clearly requires otherwise, current agency practices .”
Kailin v. Clallam Cnty., 152 Wash. App. 974 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “RCW 90.58.175. RCW 90.58.180(1). RCW 90.58.”
Sammamish Cmty. Council v. City of Bellevue, 108 Wash. App. 46 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “230; RCW 90.58.175. In view of our disposition of this issue, it is not necessary for us to decide whether the councils exhausted their administrative remedies or whether they have the statutory authority to bring a claim against the City based on an alleged violation of the GMA.”
Kailin v. Clallam Cnty., 220 P.3d 222 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “[13] RCW 90.58.175. [14] RCW 90.58.180(1). [15] RCW 90.”
SAMMAMISH COUNCIL v. City of Bellevue, 29 P.3d 728 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “230; RCW 90.58.175. [3] In view of our disposition of this issue, it is not necessary for us to decide whether the councils exhausted their administrative remedies or whether they have the statutory authority to bring a claim against the City based on an alleged violation of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.