West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 3-9-14 (2026)

Repealed. Acts, 2010 Reg. Sess., Ch. 76

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 9. OFFENSES AND PENALTIES.

§3-9-14.

Repealed.

Acts, 2010 Reg. Sess., Ch. 76.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–2011 · leading case: Anderson's Paving, Inc. v. Hayes, 295 S.E.2d 805 (W. Va. 1982).
Anderson's Paving, Inc. v. Hayes, 295 S.E.2d 805 (W. Va. 1982). · cites it 4× “" [1] Justice Rehnquist dissented on the basis that the First Amendment has only limited applicability to the States under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Fourteenth Amendment applies to persons and not corporations.”
Ctr. for Individual Freedom, Inc. v. Tennant, 849 F. Supp. 2d 659 (S.D. W. Va. 2011). · cites it 2× “In particular, W. Va.Code § 3-9-14 was repealed, and §§ 3-8-1 (purposes), 3-8-la (definitions), 3-8-2 (requirements for reporting independent expenditures), 3-8-8 (corporate contribution ban), and 3-8-12 (anonymous advertising ban) were amended, effective June 11, 2010.”
Cowan v. Cnty. Com'n of Logan Cty., 240 S.E.2d 675 (W. Va. 1977). · cites it 2× “The crucial provision is W.Va.Code § 3-9-14 which provides in full that: Any corporation which shall, by its officers, agents or otherwise, offer, give or use, or cause to be offered, given or used, or place or cause to be placed, in the possession, under the control or at the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.