W. Va. Code » §44D-1-101. Short title.
West Virginia Code

W. Va. Code § 44D-1-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WV-LEGwvlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND DEFINITIONS.

§44D-1-101. Short title.

This chapter may be cited as the West Virginia Uniform Trust Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: State of West Virginia v. Stephanie Elaine Louk, 786 S.E.2d 219 (W. Va. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of West Virginia v. Stephanie Elaine Louk, 786 S.E.2d 219 (W. Va. 2016). · cites it 4× “” Unborn children are also expressly addressed in the West Virginia Uniform Trust Code, W.Va. Code § 44D-1-101, et seq. [2011]. This statute specifically protects the rights of an “unborn individual” who has an interest in a matter arising under the Uniform Trust Code.”
Robert Paul Jackson v. Pamela S. Brown, Adm'x, etc., 801 S.E.2d 194 (W. Va. 2017). · cites it 2× “By way of background, the model Uniform Trust Code was promulgated in 2000 by “the National Conference of 'Commissioners on Uniform State Laws [which] replaced the' Uniform Trust Act with the Uniform Trust Code.”
In Re: Est. of J. Herman Isner, No. 15-0904 (W. Va. Sept. 23, 2016). “7 West Virginia Code § 44D-1-111 constitutes part of the West Virginia Uniform Trust Code, West Virginia Code §§ 44D-1-101 to -11-1105. 8 In his opening brief, petitioner does not mention the argument that any bank appointed as trustee must meet a minimum threshold of $100…”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co., No. E2015-00941-SC-R11-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 20, 2017). “2-808 (2012); W. Va. Code §§ 44D-1-101 to 44D-11-1105 (2013); Wis.”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co., No. E2015-00941-SC-R11-CV (Tenn. Oct. 20, 2017). “2-808 (2012); W. Va. Code §§ 44D-1-101 to 44D-11-1105 (2013); Wis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.