§52-1-17. Reimbursement of jurors.
(a) A juror shall be paid mileage, at the rate set by the Secretary of the Department of Administration, for travel expenses to and from the juror’s residence to the courthouse or other place where the court is convened and shall be reimbursed for other expenses incurred as a result of his or her required attendance at sessions of the court at a rate of not less than $15 nor more than $40, set at the discretion of the circuit court or the chief judge of the circuit court, for each day of required attendance. The reimbursement shall be based on vouchers submitted to the sheriff and shall be paid out of the State Treasury.
(b) When a jury in any case is placed in the custody of the sheriff, he or she shall provide the jury with meals and lodging while they are in the sheriff’s custody at a reasonable cost to be determined by an order of the court. The costs of the meals and lodging shall be paid out of the State Treasury.
(c) Any time a panel of prospective jurors has been required to report to court for the selection of a petit jury in any scheduled matter, the court shall, by specific provision in a court order, assess a jury cost. In both magistrate and circuit court cases the jury cost shall be the actual cost of the jurors’ service: Provided, That the actual cost of a magistrate jury can only be assessed where the jury request or demand occurs on or after July 1, 2007. For any magistrate court case in which the jury request or demand occurred prior to July 1, 2007, the jury cost assessed shall be $200. The jury costs shall be assessed against the parties as follows:
(1) In every criminal case, against the defendant upon conviction, whether by plea, by bench trial or by jury verdict;
(2) In every civil case, against either party or prorated against both parties, at the court’s discretion, if the parties settle the case or elect for a bench trial; and
(3) In the discretion of the court, and only when fairness and justice so require, a circuit court or magistrate court may forego assessment of the jury fee, but shall set out the reasons for waiving the fee in a written order: Provided, That a waiver of the assessment of a jury fee in a case tried before a jury in magistrate court may only be permitted after the circuit court, or the chief judge of the circuit court, has reviewed the reasons set forth in the order by the magistrate and has approved the waiver.
(d)(1) The circuit or magistrate court clerk shall by the tenth day of the month following the month of collection remit to the State Treasurer for deposit as described in subdivision (2) of this subsection all jury costs collected and the clerk and the clerk’s surety are liable for the collection on the clerk’s official bond as for other money coming into the clerk’s hands by virtue of the clerk’s office. When the amount of the jury costs collected in a magistrate court case exceeds $200, the magistrate court clerk shall separately delineate the portion of the collected jury costs which exceeds $200.
(2) The jury costs described in subdivision (1) of this subsection shall upon receipt by the State Treasurer be deposited as follows:
(A) All jury costs collected in a magistrate court case which exceed $200 shall be deposited in the State’s General Revenue Fund; and
(B) The remaining balance of the collected jury costs shall be deposited as follows:
(i) One-half shall be deposited into the Parent Education and Mediation Fund created in section six hundred four, article nine, chapter forty-eight of this code; and
(ii) One-half shall be deposited into the Domestic Violence Legal Services Fund created in section six hundred three, article twenty-six of chapter forty-eight of this code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case:
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
· cites it 53× “Myers require us to interpret W. Va.Code § 52-1-17(c) to ascertain whether the statute may be applied to impose jury costs for a conviction that has been reversed, but where the defendant has subsequently been reconvicted.”
State ex rel. Core v. Merrifield, 502 S.E.2d 197 (W. Va. 1998).
· cites it 8× “When the court orders a jury to be placed in the custody of the sheriff or other officer or officers, the court shall, in its discretion, determine the manner in which such jury shall be kept in custody by the sheriff or other officer or *113 officers until the jury agree upon a…”
Carper v. Watson, 697 S.E.2d 86 (W. Va. 2010).
“Myers was a criminal case in which the defendant was assessed jury fees as “costs,” pursuant to West Virginia Code § 52-1-17. 216 W.Va. at 123-24 , 602 S.E.”
McKenzie v. Sevier, 854 S.E.2d 236 (W. Va. 2020).
· cites it 8× “See W. Va. Code § 52-1-17 (c)(3). 31 the circuit court has discretion to assess the costs to either party, or both parties, if the parties elect for a bench trial.”
Martin v. Lovelace, No. 19-0745, 2021 WL 2182344 (W. Va. May 28, 2021).
· cites it 2× “8 See W. Va. Code § 52-1-17 (3), in part (“In the discretion of the court, and only when fairness and justice so require, a circuit court or magistrate court may forego assessment of the jury fee, but shall set out the reasons for waiving the fee in a written order[.”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(3): 1 case
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(a): 1 case
State ex rel. Core v. Merrifield, 502 S.E.2d 197 (W. Va. 1998).
“When the court orders a jury to be placed in the custody of the sheriff or other officer or officers, the court shall, in its discretion, determine the manner in which such jury shall be kept in custody by the sheriff or other officer or *113 officers until the jury agree upon a…”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(b): 1 case
State ex rel. Core v. Merrifield, 502 S.E.2d 197 (W. Va. 1998).
“When the court orders a jury to be placed in the custody of the sheriff or other officer or officers, the court shall, in its discretion, determine the manner in which such jury shall be kept in custody by the sheriff or other officer or *113 officers until the jury agree upon a…”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(c): 2 cases
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
“Myers require us to interpret W. Va.Code § 52-1-17(c) to ascertain whether the statute may be applied to impose jury costs for a conviction that has been reversed, but where the defendant has subsequently been reconvicted.”
McKenzie v. Sevier, 854 S.E.2d 236 (W. Va. 2020).
“See W. Va. Code § 52-1-17 (c)(3). 31 the circuit court has discretion to assess the costs to either party, or both parties, if the parties elect for a bench trial.”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(c)(1): 1 case
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
“Myers require us to interpret W. Va.Code § 52-1-17(c) to ascertain whether the statute may be applied to impose jury costs for a conviction that has been reversed, but where the defendant has subsequently been reconvicted.”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(c)(2): 1 case
McKenzie v. Sevier, 854 S.E.2d 236 (W. Va. 2020).
“See W. Va. Code § 52-1-17 (c)(3). 31 the circuit court has discretion to assess the costs to either party, or both parties, if the parties elect for a bench trial.”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(c)(3): 1 case
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
“Myers require us to interpret W. Va.Code § 52-1-17(c) to ascertain whether the statute may be applied to impose jury costs for a conviction that has been reversed, but where the defendant has subsequently been reconvicted.”
W. Va. Code § 52-1-17(e): 1 case
State v. Myers, 602 S.E.2d 796 (W. Va. 2004).
“Myers require us to interpret W. Va.Code § 52-1-17(c) to ascertain whether the statute may be applied to impose jury costs for a conviction that has been reversed, but where the defendant has subsequently been reconvicted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.