Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (2026)

Uniform fiduciaries act

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
112.01112.01Uniform fiduciaries act.
112.01(1)(1)Definitions. In this section unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:
112.01(1)(a)(a) “Bank” includes any person or association of persons, whether incorporated or not, carrying on the business of banking.
112.01(1)(b)(b) “Fiduciary” includes a trustee under any trust, expressed, implied, resulting, or constructive, personal representative, guardian, conservator, curator, receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, assignee for the benefit of creditors, prime contractor or subcontractor who is a trustee under ch. 779, partner, agent, officer of a corporation, public or private, public officer, or any other person acting in a fiduciary capacity for any person, trust, or estate.
112.01(1)(c)(c) A thing is done “in good faith” within the meaning of this section, when it is in fact done honestly, whether it be done negligently or not.
112.01(1)(d)(d) “Person” includes a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other association or 2 or more persons having a joint or common interest.
112.01(1)(e)(e) “Principal” includes any person to whom a fiduciary as such owes an obligation.
112.01(3)(3)Application of payments made to fiduciaries. A person who in good faith pays or transfers to a fiduciary any money or other property which the fiduciary as such is authorized to receive, is not responsible for the proper application thereof by the fiduciary; and any right or title acquired from the fiduciary in consideration of such payment or transfer is not invalid in consequence of a misapplication by the fiduciary.
112.01(5)(5)Transfer of negotiable instrument by fiduciary. If any negotiable instrument payable or endorsed to a fiduciary as such is endorsed by the fiduciary, or if any negotiable instrument payable or endorsed to a fiduciary’s principal is endorsed by a fiduciary empowered to endorse such instrument on behalf of his or her principal, the endorsee is not bound to inquire whether the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in endorsing or delivering the instrument, and is not chargeable with notice that the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary, unless the endorsee takes the instrument with actual knowledge of such breach or with knowledge of such facts that the endorsee’s action in taking the instrument amounts to bad faith. If, however, such instrument is transferred by the fiduciary in payment of or as security for a personal debt of the fiduciary to the actual knowledge of the creditor, or is transferred in any transaction known by the transferee to be for the personal benefit of the fiduciary, the creditor or other transferee is liable to the principal if the fiduciary in fact commits a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in transferring the instrument.
112.01(6)(6)Check drawn by fiduciary payable to 3rd person. If a check or other bill of exchange is drawn by a fiduciary as such, or in the name of a fiduciary’s principal by a fiduciary empowered to draw such instrument in the name of his or her principal, the payee is not bound to inquire whether the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing or delivering the instrument, and is not chargeable with notice that the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary unless the payee takes the instrument with actual knowledge of such breach, or with knowledge of such facts that the payee’s action in taking the instrument amounts to bad faith. If, however, such instrument is payable to a personal creditor of the fiduciary and delivered to the creditor in payment of or as security for a personal debt of the fiduciary to the actual knowledge of the creditor, or is drawn and delivered in any transaction known by the payee to be for the personal benefit of the fiduciary, the creditor or other payee is liable to the principal if the fiduciary in fact commits a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing or delivering the instrument.
112.01(7)(7)Check drawn by and payable to fiduciary. If a check or other bill of exchange is drawn by a fiduciary as such, or in the name of a fiduciary’s principal by a fiduciary empowered to draw such instrument in the name of his or her principal, payable to the fiduciary personally, or payable to a 3rd person, and transferred by the 3rd person to the fiduciary, and is thereafter transferred by the fiduciary, whether in payment of a personal debt of the fiduciary or otherwise, the transferee is not bound to inquire whether the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in transferring the instrument, and is not chargeable with notice that the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary, unless the transferee takes the instrument with actual knowledge of such breach, or with knowledge of such facts that the transferee’s action in taking the instrument amounts to bad faith.
112.01(8)(8)Deposit in name of fiduciary as such. If a deposit is made in a bank to the credit of a fiduciary as such, the bank is authorized to pay the amount of the deposit or any part thereof upon the check of the fiduciary, signed with the name in which such deposit is entered, without being liable to the principal, unless the bank pays the check with actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing the check, or with knowledge of such facts that its action in paying the check amounts to bad faith. If, however, such a check is payable to the drawee bank, and is delivered to it in payment of or as security for a personal debt of the fiduciary to it, the bank is liable to the principal if the fiduciary in fact commits a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing or delivering the check.
112.01(9)(9)Deposit in name of principal. If a check is drawn upon the account of a fiduciary’s principal in a bank by a fiduciary, who is empowered to draw checks upon his or her principal’s account, the bank is authorized to pay such check without being liable to the principal, unless the bank pays the check with actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing such check, or with knowledge of such facts that its action in paying the check amounts to bad faith. If, however, such a check is payable to the drawee bank and is delivered to it in payment of or as security for a personal debt of the fiduciary to it, the bank is liable to the principal if the fiduciary in fact commits a breach of the fiduciary’s obligation as fiduciary in drawing or delivering the check.
112.01(10)(10)Deposit in fiduciary’s personal account. If a fiduciary makes a deposit in a bank to the fiduciary’s personal credit of checks drawn by the fiduciary upon an account in his or her own name as fiduciary, or of checks payable to the fiduciary as fiduciary, or of checks drawn by the fiduciary upon an account in the name of his or her principal if the fiduciary is empowered to draw checks thereon, or of checks payable to his or her principal and endorsed by the fiduciary, if the fiduciary is empowered to endorse such checks, or if the fiduciary otherwise makes a deposit of funds held by the fiduciary as fiduciary, the bank receiving such deposit is not bound to inquire whether the fiduciary is committing thereby a breach of his or her obligation as fiduciary. The bank is authorized to pay the amount of the deposit or any part thereof upon the personal check of the fiduciary, including checks payable to the bank, without being liable to the principal, unless the bank receives the deposit or pays the check with actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of his or her obligation as fiduciary in making such deposit or in drawing such check, or with knowledge of such facts that its action in receiving the deposit or paying the check amounts to bad faith, and the bank paying the check is not bound to inquire whether the fiduciary is committing thereby a breach of his or her obligation as fiduciary.
112.01(11)(11)Deposit or safe deposit box rental in name of estate or two or more fiduciaries. When a deposit is made in a bank account or a safe deposit box or storage space rented, in the names of 2 or more persons as trustees or personal representatives, or in the name of an estate having 2 or more personal representatives, and a check is drawn upon the account, or access to the safe deposit box or storage space is sought by any one or more of the fiduciaries authorized by the other fiduciary or fiduciaries to draw checks upon the account, or to enter the safe deposit box or storage space, neither the payee nor the other holder nor the bank is bound to inquire whether it is a breach of trust to authorize the fiduciary or fiduciaries to draw checks upon the account, or to enter the safe deposit box or storage space, and is not liable unless the circumstances are such that the action of the payee or other holder or the bank amounts to bad faith.
112.01(12)(12)Not retroactive. The provisions of this section shall not apply to transactions taking place prior to June 4, 1925.
112.01(13)(13)Cases not provided for in section. In any case not provided for in this section the rules of law and equity, including the law merchant and those rules of law and equity relating to trusts, agency, negotiable instruments and banking, shall continue to apply.
112.01(14)(14)Uniformity of interpretation. This section shall be so interpreted and construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those states which enact it.
112.01(15)(15)Short title. This section may be cited as the “Uniform Fiduciaries Act”.
112.01(16)(16)Inconsistent laws repealed. All acts or parts of acts inconsistent with this section are repealed.
112.01 AnnotationActual knowledge or bad faith is a precondition for liability under sub. (6). Bolger v. Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, 143 Wis. 2d 766, 423 N.W.2d 173 (Ct. App. 1988).
112.01 AnnotationSub. (10) applies when a person is actually acting as a fiduciary and the bank is aware that it is dealing with a fiduciary. If these facts are not present, the defenses contained in sub. (10) do not apply. Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd., 203 Wis. 2d 341, 553 N.W.2d 281 (Ct. App. 1996), 95-2235.
112.01 AnnotationThe six-year limitations period found in s. 893.93 (1) (a) [now s. 893.93 (1m) (a)] applies to actions under this section. Willowglen Academy-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35, 307 Wis. 2d 776, 746 N.W.2d 570, 07-1178.
112.01 AnnotationSub. (6) imposes no requirement that a personal creditor who receives a check drawn by a fiduciary know the exact fiduciary relationship. Willowglen Academy-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35, 307 Wis. 2d 776, 746 N.W.2d 570, 07-1178.
112.01 AnnotationSub. (6) pertains to checks drawn by a fiduciary as such, or in the name of a fiduciary’s principal by a fiduciary empowered to draw the instrument in the name of the principal. To “draw” under sub. (6) does not equate solely with the act of personally signing the instrument in question. Here, the fiduciary “drew” checks by using a check machine and a facsimile stamp containing the signatures of the employing company’s copresidents. Willowglen Academy-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35, 307 Wis. 2d 776, 746 N.W.2d 570, 07-1178.
112.01 AnnotationDiscussing the standard for determining “bad faith” under sub. (9). Koss Corp. v. Park Bank, 2019 WI 7, 385 Wis. 2d 261, 922 N.W.2d 20, 16-0636.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2023 · leading case: Koss Corp. v. Park Bank, 922 N.W.2d 20 (Wis. 2019).
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank, 922 N.W.2d 20 (Wis. 2019). · cites it 151× “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
Zastrow v. Journal Commc'ns, Inc., 2006 WI 72 (Wis. 2006). · cites it 16× “The circuit court found the Trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs because the Trustees told the plaintiffs "they had to sell-back their Trust units over a 1 to 5 year period, and no information was provided plaintiffs in writing about the availability of the…”
Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 41× “), Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (6) (2003-04), arising out of Anthony Jansen's (Jansen), Willowglen's former chief financial officer and treasurer, misappropriation of Willowglen funds.”
Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of Oregon, 275 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 10× “1 Uniform, Fiduciaries Act Rascar alleges a second claim under the Uniform Fiduciaries Act (sec. 112.01, Stats.). Section 112.01(9) reads: (9) DEPOSIT IN NAME OF PRINCIPAL.”
Bolger v. Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, 423 N.W.2d 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 15× “The various subparts of sec. 112.01, Stats., generally preclude liability by a third party dealing with a fiduciary if the third party acts in good faith and without actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of his obligation.”
Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin, 2005 WI 109 (Wis. 2005). · cites it 2× “Hatleberg raises three arguments that Wells Fargo breached a duty in its capacity as Erickson's trustee. First, she argues that Wells Fargo, as trustee, had a duty to review the trust to ensure that it worked for its intended purpose.”
Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd., 553 N.W.2d 281 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 13× “Firstar argued that, under § 112.01(10), Stats., it escaped liability because Kleist had held and deposited the Larsons' check as a "fiduciary.”
Cmty. Nat'l Bank v. Med. Benefit Administrators, LLC, 2001 WI App 98 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “1942); Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(b). ¶ 8. While no Wisconsin precedent has directly addressed the scope of a receiver's duty of loyalty to an insolvent corporation, other jurisdictions have con- *634 eluded that a receiver has a fiduciary duty to all parties with an interest in…”
Springfield Twp. v. Mellon PSFS Bank, 889 A.2d 1184 (Pa. 2005). · cites it 2× “In doing so, the court found that Section 9 of the UFA clearly and unambiguously requires that in order for the statute to apply and protect a bank, the person that misappropriated the funds must have been, in fact, a fiduciary of the company. The court specifically stated the…”
Eau Claire Cnty. v. Loken (In Re Loken), 32 B.R. 205 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1983). · cites it 2× “Wis.Stat. § 112.01(l)(b), provides: “ ‘[fiduciary’ includes a trustee under any trust, expressed, implied, resulting or constructive, .”
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank (Wis. 2019). · cites it 69× “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
Loehrke v. Wanta Builders, Inc., 445 N.W.2d 717 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “for any purpose other than the payment of claims on such public improvement, before the claims have been satisfied, constitutes theft by the prime contractor . . . and is punishable under s. 943.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(1) — 1 case
Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of Oregon, 275 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978). “1 Uniform, Fiduciaries Act Rascar alleges a second claim under the Uniform Fiduciaries Act (sec. 112.01, Stats.). Section 112.01(9) reads: (9) DEPOSIT IN NAME OF PRINCIPAL.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(1)(b) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(1)(c) — 3 cases
Zastrow v. Journal Commc'ns, Inc., 2006 WI 72 (Wis. 2006). “The circuit court found the Trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs because the Trustees told the plaintiffs "they had to sell-back their Trust units over a 1 to 5 year period, and no information was provided plaintiffs in writing about the availability of the…”
Creditbox.com, LLC v. Antjuan Weathers, 2023 WI App 37 (Wis. Ct. App. 2023).
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(10) — 2 cases
Springfield Twp. v. Mellon PSFS Bank, 889 A.2d 1184 (Pa. 2005). “In doing so, the court found that Section 9 of the UFA clearly and unambiguously requires that in order for the statute to apply and protect a bank, the person that misappropriated the funds must have been, in fact, a fiduciary of the company. The court specifically stated the…”
Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd., 553 N.W.2d 281 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “Firstar argued that, under § 112.01(10), Stats., it escaped liability because Kleist had held and deposited the Larsons' check as a "fiduciary.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(14) — 3 cases
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank, 922 N.W.2d 20 (Wis. 2019). “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank (Wis. 2019). “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(3) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(6) — 3 cases
Bolger v. Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, 423 N.W.2d 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “The various subparts of sec. 112.01, Stats., generally preclude liability by a third party dealing with a fiduciary if the third party acts in good faith and without actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of his obligation.”
Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). “), Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (6) (2003-04), arising out of Anthony Jansen's (Jansen), Willowglen's former chief financial officer and treasurer, misappropriation of Willowglen funds.”
Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd., 553 N.W.2d 281 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “Firstar argued that, under § 112.01(10), Stats., it escaped liability because Kleist had held and deposited the Larsons' check as a "fiduciary.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(9) — 4 cases
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank, 922 N.W.2d 20 (Wis. 2019). “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
Rascar, Inc. v. Bank of Oregon, 275 N.W.2d 108 (Wis. Ct. App. 1978). “1 Uniform, Fiduciaries Act Rascar alleges a second claim under the Uniform Fiduciaries Act (sec. 112.01, Stats.). Section 112.01(9) reads: (9) DEPOSIT IN NAME OF PRINCIPAL.”
Koss Corp. v. Park Bank (Wis. 2019). “3 ¶2 Our review centers on two related issues: First, consistent with the UFA, we interpret and apply the terms "good faith" as set out in Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(c) and "bad faith" employed in § 112.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(l)(b) — 5 cases
Eau Claire Cnty. v. Loken (In Re Loken), 32 B.R. 205 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1983). “Wis.Stat. § 112.01(l)(b), provides: “ ‘[fiduciary’ includes a trustee under any trust, expressed, implied, resulting or constructive, .”
Loehrke v. Wanta Builders, Inc., 445 N.W.2d 717 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). “for any purpose other than the payment of claims on such public improvement, before the claims have been satisfied, constitutes theft by the prime contractor . . . and is punishable under s. 943.”
Bolger v. Merrill Lynch Ready Assets Trust, 423 N.W.2d 173 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). “The various subparts of sec. 112.01, Stats., generally preclude liability by a third party dealing with a fiduciary if the third party acts in good faith and without actual knowledge that the fiduciary is committing a breach of his obligation.”
Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd., 553 N.W.2d 281 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996). “Firstar argued that, under § 112.01(10), Stats., it escaped liability because Kleist had held and deposited the Larsons' check as a "fiduciary.”
Willowglen Academy - Wisconsin, Inc. v. Connelly Interiors, Inc., 2008 WI App 35 (Wis. Ct. App. 2008). “), Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (6) (2003-04), arising out of Anthony Jansen's (Jansen), Willowglen's former chief financial officer and treasurer, misappropriation of Willowglen funds.”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(l)(c) — 1 case
Zastrow v. Journal Commc'ns, Inc., 2006 WI 72 (Wis. 2006). “The circuit court found the Trustees breached their fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs because the Trustees told the plaintiffs "they had to sell-back their Trust units over a 1 to 5 year period, and no information was provided plaintiffs in writing about the availability of the…”
— Wis. Stat. § 112.01(l)(e) — 1 case
Cmty. Nat'l Bank v. Med. Benefit Administrators, LLC, 2001 WI App 98 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “1942); Wis. Stat. § 112.01 (1)(b). ¶ 8. While no Wisconsin precedent has directly addressed the scope of a receiver's duty of loyalty to an insolvent corporation, other jurisdictions have con- *634 eluded that a receiver has a fiduciary duty to all parties with an interest in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.