Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 15 — STRUCTURE OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 15.225 (2026)

Same; attached boards and commission

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
15.22515.225 Same; attached boards and commission.
15.225(2)(2) Employment relations commission. There is created an employment relations commission which is attached to the department of workforce development under s. 15.03, except the budget of the employment relations commission shall be transmitted by the department to the governor without change or modification by the department, unless agreed to by the employment relations commission.
15.225 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 29; 1995 a. 27 ss. 107 to 111, 9126 (19), 9130 (4); 1995 a. 221; 1997 a. 3; 1999 a. 9; 2001 a. 16; 2003 a. 33; 2005 a. 25; 2013 a. 20 s. 47; 2015 a. 55.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2014 · leading case: Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Div. of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86 (Wis. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Div. of Hearings & Appeals, 2006 WI 86 (Wis. 2006). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 15.225 (1). Wis. Stat. § 15.”
Asma Masri v. State of Wisconsin Labor & Indus. Review, 2014 WI 81 (Wis. 2014). · cites it 3× “§ 15.225 (1); see DILHR v. LIRC, 193 Wis.”
Beloit Corp. v. State Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 449 N.W.2d 299 (Wis. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 15.225. Under sec. 102.18(3), LIRC may affirm, reverse, set aside or modify the findings and orders of the department.”
Topp v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 395 N.W.2d 815 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986). “LIRC exists by reason of sec. 15.225(1), Stats., and is attached to the department *428 under sec.”
— Wis. Stat. § 15.225(1) — 1 case
Topp v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 395 N.W.2d 815 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986). “LIRC exists by reason of sec. 15.225(1), Stats., and is attached to the department *428 under sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.