Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 230.02 (2026)

Liberal construction of statutes

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
230.02230.02Liberal construction of statutes. Statutes applicable to the division and bureau shall be construed liberally in aid of the purposes declared in s. 230.01.
230.02 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 196; 2003 a. 33; 2015 a. 55.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1945–2017 · leading case: State of Wisconsin Dep't of Just. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2015 WI 114 (Wis. 2015).
State of Wisconsin Dep't of Just. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2015 WI 114 (Wis. 2015). · cites it 19× “Wis. Stat. § 230.02 . However, Wis. Stat.”
State v. Luis C. Salinas, 2016 WI 44 (Wis. 2016). · cites it 4× “89 despite clear legislative directive in Wis. Stat. § 230.02 to "construe[ ] [the statutes] liberally in aid of the purposes declared .”
Hutson v. State Pers. Comm'n, 2003 WI 97 (Wis. 2003). · cites it 2× “Although these protective statutes are to be liberally construed, see Wis. Stat. § 230.02 , only certain disclosures made a particular way and regarding a subject matter covered in the statute will qualify for protection.”
Bethards v. State Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2017 WI App 37 (Wis. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “§ 230.02 provides that statutes "applicable to the division and bureau shall be construed liberally in aid of the purposes declared in [Wis.”
Feest v. Hillcrest Cemetery, Inc., 19 N.W.2d 246 (Wis. 1945). “If the deed conveys an estate in land it conveys an estate of inheritance, and such an estate is one in fee simple under sec. 230.02, Stats., which has been in force ever since the enactment of sec.”
Albrechtsen v. Wisconsin Dep't of Workforce Dev., 2005 WI App 241 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 230.02. I therefore conclude that, had the Commission dismissed Albrechtsen's claim when he filed the federal action, the Commission would have had the authority to vacate that order after dismissal of the § 230.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.