Notes of Decisions
State v. Zachary S. Friedlander, 923 N.W.2d 849 (Wis. 2019).
· cites it 16× “8 Specifically, this court referenced Wis. Stat. §§ 301.046 ("Community residential confinement.”
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 34× “" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
State Ex Rel. Harris v. Smith, 582 N.W.2d 131 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 11× “, whereas Santiago was placed in a CRC setting pursuant to § 301.046, Stats. Nonetheless, we see no reason why the logic of the Santiago case should not apply to a case such as Harris' for the following reasons.”
State Ex Rel. Simpson v. Schwarz, 2002 WI App 7 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 4× “Wis. Stat. § 301.046 (6) because Simpson was not placed on electronic monitoring by DOC.”
State v. Magnuson, 2000 WI 19 (Wis. 2000).
· cites it 4× “For example, Wis. Stat. § 301.046 (1) addresses the community residential confinement program, describing this program as a "correctional institution" and the residents as "prisoners.”
United States v. Templeton, 543 F.3d 378 (7th Cir. 2008).
“” Wis. Stat. § 301.046 (5). If a prisoner intentionally fails to return from this furlough, he is guilty of escape without so much as moving a muscle.”
State v. Holliman, 509 N.W.2d 73 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
· cites it 3× “Holliman neglects to indicate that as part of the intensive sanctions program he was placed in community residential confinement, which is governed by sec. 301.046, Stats. 3 Therefore, Holliman is subject to both secs.”
State Ex Rel. MacEmon v. McReynolds, 561 N.W.2d 779 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997).
“See §§ 301.046(5) and 301.048(3)(a)3, STATS. Macemon then argues that the apparent legislative silence with respect to individuals slated for mandatory release parole means that the *597 department's power to use electronic monitoring is limited to only the two above situations.”
State v. Zachary S. Friedlander (Wis. 2019).
· cites it 8× “8 Specifically, this court referenced Wis. Stat. §§ 301.046 ("Community residential confinement.”
State v. Allen J. Campbell (Wis. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 301.046(1) addresses the community residential confinement program, describing its residents as “prisoners” who may be charged with escape for unauthorized flight from the program.”
United States v. Templeton, Todd A. (7th Cir. 2008).
“” Wis. Stat. §301.046 (5). If a prisoner intentionally fails to return from this furlough, he is guilty of escape without so much as moving a muscle.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(1) — 5 cases
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
“" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
State v. Zachary S. Friedlander, 923 N.W.2d 849 (Wis. 2019).
“8 Specifically, this court referenced Wis. Stat. §§ 301.046 ("Community residential confinement.”
State Ex Rel. Harris v. Smith, 582 N.W.2d 131 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
“, whereas Santiago was placed in a CRC setting pursuant to § 301.046, Stats. Nonetheless, we see no reason why the logic of the Santiago case should not apply to a case such as Harris' for the following reasons.”
State v. Allen J. Campbell (Wis. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 301.046(1) addresses the community residential confinement program, describing its residents as “prisoners” who may be charged with escape for unauthorized flight from the program.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(2) — 2 cases
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
“" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
State Ex Rel. Harris v. Smith, 582 N.W.2d 131 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
“, whereas Santiago was placed in a CRC setting pursuant to § 301.046, Stats. Nonetheless, we see no reason why the logic of the Santiago case should not apply to a case such as Harris' for the following reasons.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(3) — 1 case
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
“" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(3m) — 1 case
State v. Holliman, 509 N.W.2d 73 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
“Holliman neglects to indicate that as part of the intensive sanctions program he was placed in community residential confinement, which is governed by sec. 301.046, Stats. 3 Therefore, Holliman is subject to both secs.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(5) — 2 cases
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
“" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
State Ex Rel. MacEmon v. McReynolds, 561 N.W.2d 779 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997).
“See §§ 301.046(5) and 301.048(3)(a)3, STATS. Macemon then argues that the apparent legislative silence with respect to individuals slated for mandatory release parole means that the *597 department's power to use electronic monitoring is limited to only the two above situations.”
— Wis. Stat. § 301.046(6) — 4 cases
State v. Zachary S. Friedlander, 923 N.W.2d 849 (Wis. 2019).
“8 Specifically, this court referenced Wis. Stat. §§ 301.046 ("Community residential confinement.”
Santiago v. Ware, 556 N.W.2d 356 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996).
“" Section 301.046; WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 327. CRC inmates must "wear an electronic device continuously on the inmate's person.”
State v. Holliman, 509 N.W.2d 73 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993).
“Holliman neglects to indicate that as part of the intensive sanctions program he was placed in community residential confinement, which is governed by sec. 301.046, Stats. 3 Therefore, Holliman is subject to both secs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.