Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 344.24 (2026)
Applicability of sections relating to proof of financial responsibility for the future
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
344.24344.24 Applicability of sections relating to proof of financial responsibility for the future. Sections 344.29 to 344.41 are applicable in all cases in which a person is required to deposit proof of financial responsibility for the future, including those cases in which a person is required to deposit proof of financial responsibility for the future under ss. 344.25 to 344.27, those cases in which the deposit of proof of financial responsibility for the future is a condition precedent to reinstatement of an operating privilege or registration suspended or revoked under s. 344.14, 344.18 (3) or 344.19 (3) and those cases in which the deposit of proof of financial responsibility for the future is a condition precedent to issuance of an operator’s license under s. 343.38 (4) or reinstatement of an operating privilege revoked under ch. 343.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2022 · leading case: Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2005 WI 125 (Wis. 2005).
Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2005 WI 125 (Wis. 2005). “Wis. Stat. §§ 344.24 -.33. This may be provided either as a self-insured driver or through purchased insurance.”
Keane v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 464 N.W.2d 830 (Wis. 1991). “Sections 344.24 [6] and 344.29, Stats. 1987-88.”
Bindrim v. B. & J. Ins. Agency, 527 N.W.2d 320 (Wis. 1995). “Similarly, the language of the Financial Responsibility Statutes, sec. 344.24, Stats., et seq., does not provide an exemption from the Omnibus Statute.”
Nutter v. Milwaukee Ins., 481 N.W.2d 701 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992). “See sec. 344.24, Stats. (1987-88). 2 The methods by which motorists may satisfy the financial responsibility requirement are specified in sec.”
Beerbohm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2000 WI App 105 (Wis. Ct. App. 2000). “§§ 344.24 to 344.42. Under these statutes, "drivers whose licenses have been revoked because of their poor driving records are required to show proof of financial responsibility to have their operators licenses reinstated.”
Knight v. Heritage Mut. Ins., 239 N.W.2d 348 (Wis. 1976). “this policy shall comply with such law if applicable, to the extent of the coverage and limits required thereby .”
McKillip v. Bauman, 2005 WI App 165 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “See Wis. Stat. § 344.24 . This requirement can be fulfilled by obtaining liability insurance with the coverage defined in Wis.”
Bindrim v. Colonial Ins., 512 N.W.2d 210 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “Likewise, we find no language in sec. 344.24, Stats., or anywhere else in the financial responsibility statutes, which would indicate that a policy issued pursuant to the financial responsibility statutes is exempt from the mandatory language of sec.”
Jessica Mabin v. Talgat Konkargaev (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “In the reply brief she may intend to indicate that her point is that the reference in subparagraph a. to “proof of financial responsibility for the future,” is, in her words, “likely” a reference not to federal financial responsibility laws and the use of MCS-90 endorsements but…”
Peabody v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 582 N.W.2d 753 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). “Also, the insurer had certified to the Secretary of Transportation that its policy fulfilled the requirements of the financial responsibility statutes, §§ 344.24, et seq., STATS. The husband was required to file a financial responsibility statement because his driver's license…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.