Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 4.01 (2026)
First assembly district
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
4.014.01 First assembly district. All of the following territory constitutes the first assembly district:
4.01(2)(b)(b) That part of the city of Green Bay comprising U.S. census tract 20100, blocks 1010, 1011, 1017, 1018, 1019, and 1020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1966–2022 · leading case: Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008).
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). “The Town of Rhine also argues that Municipal Code § 4.01 sets forth adequate standards for obtaining a conditional use permit, and it asserts that a number of other municipalities have conditional use provisions similar to the Town of Rhine.”
Seider v. O'connell, 2000 WI 76 (Wis. 2000). “I would not conclude that § INS 4.01(2)(e) conflicts with § 632.05(2). ¶ 84.”
State v. Shoffner, 143 N.W.2d 458 (Wis. 1966). “"(1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality [wrongfulness] of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law.”
Wisconsin Prof'l Police Ass'n v. Lightbourn, 2001 WI 59 (Wis. 2001). “See Wis. Stat. § 4.01 (1957). Stipulation of Facts at ¶ 52.”
State v. Erick O. Magett, 2014 WI 67 (Wis. 2014). “" Model Penal Code § 4.01(1) at 66 (Proposed Official Draft 1962) (brackets in original).”
Eau Claire Cnty. v. Gen. Teamsters Union Local No. 662, 599 N.W.2d 423 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “, and § 4.01 of the collective bargaining agreement provide that no law enforcement employee may be disciplined without just cause.”
Towne Realty, Inc. v. Zurich Ins., 534 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995). “WINDT, INSURANCE CLAIMS AND DISPUTES § 4.01, at 128-29 (2d ed. 1988). Other jurisdictions, however, hold that an insurer's duty to defend does not arise unless the insured specifically requests the insurer to undertake the defense of the action.”
Burton v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin Sys., 171 F. Supp. 3d 830 (W.D. Wis. 2016). “Code UWS § 4.01 . In August 2013, Burton filed a discrimination charge with the ERD.”
State v. Gardner, 601 N.W.2d 670 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “We acknowledge that Wisconsin has since abandoned M'Naghten in favor of the more modern Model Penal Code §§ 4.01 and 4.03 (1962). See Laws of 1969, ch.”
Virgin Pulse Inc v. Schneider Enter. Resources LLC (E.D. Wis. 2022). “Section 4.01 of the Contract states, “If either party defaults in the performance of any of its duties or obligations under this Contract, which default is not cured within twenty-one (21) days after written notice thereof is given to the defaulting party by the non-defaulting…”
Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc., 186 F.R.D. 535 (W.D. Wis. 1998). “” 1 Newberg & Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 4.01 (3d ed.1992). Plaintiffs contend that their proposed class is suitable under subdivision (b)(3), invoked when questions common to the entire class predominate over questions applicable only to individual class members and when…”
Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee, 2001 WI 27 (Wis. 2001). “Young, Anderson's American Law of Zoning §§ 4.01 — 4.02 at 244-47. Wisconsin Stat.”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.01(1) — 2 cases
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). “The Town of Rhine also argues that Municipal Code § 4.01 sets forth adequate standards for obtaining a conditional use permit, and it asserts that a number of other municipalities have conditional use provisions similar to the Town of Rhine.”
State v. Erick O. Magett, 2014 WI 67 (Wis. 2014). “" Model Penal Code § 4.01(1) at 66 (Proposed Official Draft 1962) (brackets in original).”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.01(2) — 1 case
Town of Rhine v. Bizzell, 2008 WI 76 (Wis. 2008). “The Town of Rhine also argues that Municipal Code § 4.01 sets forth adequate standards for obtaining a conditional use permit, and it asserts that a number of other municipalities have conditional use provisions similar to the Town of Rhine.”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.01(2)(e) — 1 case
Seider v. O'connell, 2000 WI 76 (Wis. 2000). “I would not conclude that § INS 4.01(2)(e) conflicts with § 632.05(2). ¶ 84.”
— Wis. Stat. § 4.01(3) — 1 case
Jenner v. Bd. of Trs., 389 F. Supp. 430 (E.D. Wis. 1974).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.