Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 402.703 (2026)
Seller’s remedies in general
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
402.703402.703 Seller’s remedies in general. Where the buyer wrongfully rejects or revokes acceptance of goods or fails to make a payment due on or before delivery or repudiates with respect to a part or the whole, then with respect to any goods directly affected and, if the breach is of the whole contract (s. 402.612), then also with respect to the whole undelivered balance, the aggrieved seller may:
402.703(5)(5) Recover damages for nonacceptance (s. 402.708) or in a proper case the price (s. 402.709);
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1980–2005 · leading case: Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods., 2005 WI 98 (Wis. 2005).
Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods., 2005 WI 98 (Wis. 2005). “In this case, the trial record from Menard's action against Liteway reveals the extensive relationship that Menard and Liteway had in the six years they did business together.”
Livesey Enter. v. Smith Mgmt., Inc. (In Re Smith Mgmt., Inc.), 8 B.R. 346 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1980). “The Uniform Commercial Code Article 2 remedy when a buyer wrongfully “fails to make payment due on or before delivery or repudiates with respect to part of or the whole” (Wis.Stat. 402.703) is set out at Wis.Stat.”
Afram Exp. Corp. v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., 592 F. Supp. 446 (E.D. Wis. 1984). “358-360), this Court finds breach of contract by Halyps and turns to Wis.Stat. § 402.703 for the options available to the aggrieved seller: 402.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.