Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 5.061 (2026)

Compliance with federal Help America Vote Act

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
5.0615.061Compliance with federal Help America Vote Act.
5.061(1)(1)Whenever any person believes that a violation of Title III of P.L. 107-252 has occurred, is occurring, or is proposed to occur with respect to an election for national office in this state, that person may file a written, verified complaint with the commission.
5.061(2)(2)If the commission receives more than one complaint under sub. (1) relating to the same subject matter, the commission may consolidate the complaints for purposes of this section.
5.061(3)(3)A complainant under sub. (1) or any of the complainants in a consolidated complaint under sub. (2) may request a hearing and the matter shall then be treated as a contested case under ch. 227, except that the commission shall make a final determination with respect to the merits of the complaint and issue a decision within 89 days of the time that the complaint or the earliest of any complaints was filed, unless the complainant, or each of any complainants whose complaints are consolidated, consents to a specified longer period.
5.061(4)(4)If the commission finds the complaint to be without merit, it shall issue a decision dismissing the complaint. If the commission finds that the violation alleged in the complaint has occurred, is occurring, or is proposed to occur, the commission shall order appropriate relief, except that the commission shall not issue any order under this subsection affecting the right of any person to hold an elective office or affecting the canvass of an election on or after the date of that election.
5.061 HistoryHistory: 2003 a. 265; 2015 a. 118 s. 266 (10).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2022–2026 · leading case: Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022).
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022). · cites it 2× “Indeed, the record in this case comply with any law regulating the conduct of elections or election campaigns" to petition the district attorney with jurisdiction to prosecute the election official's failure); Wis. Stat. § 5.061 (directing voters to file a complaint if they…”
Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n, 2022 WI 64 (Wis. 2022). · cites it 2× “Indeed, the record in this case comply with any law regulating the conduct of elections or election campaigns" to petition the district attorney with jurisdiction to prosecute the election official's failure); Wis. Stat. § 5.061 (directing voters to file a complaint if they…”
Wisconsin Voter All. v. Millis (E.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 9× “Wisconsin’s HAVA administrative complaint procedure is set forth in Wis. Stat. § 5.061 , entitled “Compliance with federal Help America Vote Act.”
Wisconsin Voter All. v. Millis (E.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 8× “Wisconsin’s HAVA administrative complaint procedure is set forth in Wis. Stat. § 5.061 , entitled “Compliance with federal Help America Vote Act.”
Wisconsin Voter All. v. Don M. Millis (7th Cir. 2026). “Wis. Stat. §§ 5.061 (1)–(4). The Wisconsin Voter Alliance knows these procedures well.”
Wisconsin Voter All. v. Don M. Millis (7th Cir. 2026). “Wis. Stat. §§ 5.061 (1)–(4). The Wisconsin Voter Alliance knows these procedures well.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.