Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 5 — ELECTIONS — GENERAL PROVISIONS; BALLOTS AND VOTING SYSTEMS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 5.07 (2026)

Action to compel compliance

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
5.075.07 Action to compel compliance. Whenever a violation of the laws regulating the conduct of elections or election campaigns, other than a violation of the laws regulating campaign financing, occurs or is proposed to occur, the attorney general or the district attorney of the county where the violation occurs or is proposed to occur may sue for injunctive relief, a writ of mandamus or prohibition, or other such legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to compel compliance with the law. No bond is required in such actions.
5.07 HistoryHistory: 1973 c. 334; 1983 a. 484 s. 136m; Stats. 1983 s. 5.07; 1985 a. 304; 2015 a. 118.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1984–2011 · leading case: State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, 782 N.W.2d 415.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, 782 N.W.2d 415. · cites it 4× “Wis. Stat. § 5.07 . [12] Wisconsin Stat. § 5.”
Maxey v. Redevelopment Auth. of Racine, 353 N.W.2d 812 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “2 Nichols on Eminent Domain §5.07(4) (rev. 3d ed. 1983) (footnotes omitted).”
Borneman v. Corwyn Transp., Ltd., 580 N.W.2d 253 (Wis. 1998). “Blair, Workmen's Compensation, § 5.07, at 5-22 (1974). 9 See, e.g., Springfield, 10 Wis.”
Indep. Employees' Union of Hillshire Farm Co. v. Hillshire Farm Co., 638 F. Supp. 1154 (E.D. Wis. 1986). · cites it 20× “BACKGROUND In accordance with section 5.07 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement and established procedure, Company employees who want overtime work on a particular day must sign an “overtime list” at the beginning of their shift.”
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow-Madison v. Regents of Universtity of Wisconsin Sys., 820 F. Supp. 2d 932 (W.D. Wis. 2011). “If the SSFC votes to deny a student organization’s application for GSSF eligibility and the organization believes that the denial was caused by viewpoint discrimination, the organization may appeal to the student judiciary, see ASM Bylaws § 5.07(3), which is a branch of the ASM.…”
Dieckhoff v. Severson, 915 F.2d 1145 (7th Cir. 1990). “For example, Wis.Stat.Ann. § 5.07 (West Supp. 1989) and Wis.”
Wis. Stat. § 5.07(3): 1 case
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow-Madison v. Regents of Universtity of Wisconsin Sys., 820 F. Supp. 2d 932 (W.D. Wis. 2011). “If the SSFC votes to deny a student organization’s application for GSSF eligibility and the organization believes that the denial was caused by viewpoint discrimination, the organization may appeal to the student judiciary, see ASM Bylaws § 5.07(3), which is a branch of the ASM.…”
Wis. Stat. § 5.07(4): 1 case
Maxey v. Redevelopment Auth. of Racine, 353 N.W.2d 812 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “2 Nichols on Eminent Domain §5.07(4) (rev. 3d ed. 1983) (footnotes omitted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.