Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 5.10 (2026)

Presidential electors

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
5.105.10Presidential electors. Although the names of the electors do not appear on the ballot and no reference is made to them, a vote for the president and vice president named on the ballot is a vote for the electors of the candidates for whom an elector’s vote is cast. Under chs. 5 to 12, all references to the presidential election, the casting of votes and the canvassing of votes for president, or for president and vice president, mean votes for them through their pledged presidential electors.
5.10 HistoryHistory: 1973 c. 334 s. 2; Stats. 1973 s. 5.10; 1977 c. 26; 1979 c. 89, 311.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: Daniel Marx v. Richard L. Morris, 925 N.W.2d 112 (Wis. 2019).
Daniel Marx v. Richard L. Morris, 925 N.W.2d 112 (Wis. 2019). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, Section 5.10(c) of the Operating Agreement expresses the members' expectation that other members or managers (Directors) of North Star will not willfully fail to deal fairly with the LLC in a matter in which the member or manager has a material conflict of interest,…”
Luckett v. Bodner, 2009 WI 68 (Wis. 2009). · cites it 4× “2006) ("Perhaps the most significant fact about requests for admissions is that, with very few exceptions, a response that admits the matter requested conclusively puts that matter to rest."); Grenig, supra, § 411.”
Broenen v. Beaunit Corp., 305 F. Supp. 688 (E.D. Wis. 1969). · cites it 7× “” The clause of the trust indenture which covers the matter of conversion rights upon a merger is § 5.10, entitled “Provision in Case of Consolidation or Merger”.”
Melissa Anderson v. Thomas Aul, 2015 WI 19 (Wis. 2015). · cites it 2× “Anderson, Wisconsin Insurance Law § 5.10 (6th ed. 2013). 33 No. 2013AP500 legislature intended to invalidate claims-made-and-reported policies.”
Krause v. Schmidt, 341 F. Supp. 1001 (W.D. Wis. 1972). · cites it 2× “Section 5.10 of the Manual of Adult Institutions Procedures empowers the disciplinary committee to impose sanctions on an inmate adjudged guilty of a misconduct charge.”
Carpenter v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wis., 529 F. Supp. 525 (W.D. Wis. 1982). · cites it 2× “Section 5.10 3 requires that tenure appointments be approved by an academic department’s executive committee, the dean, and the chancellor.”
Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Comm'n (E.D. Wis. 2020). · cites it 12× “No. 59 at 8-9. a. Standing as a voter The amended complaint does not assert that the plaintiff voted in the 2020 general Presidential election in Wisconsin.”
In re: Wisconsin & Milwaukee Hotel LLC (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2026). · cites it 5× “853 at §5.10, p.23. The amended plan further provides that the debtor’s current owner, Jackson Street Management, LLC (JSM), has offered to pay $8 million for the equity in the reorganized debtor.”
Daniel Marx v. Richard L. Morris (Wis. 2019). · cites it 4× “Furthermore, Section 5.10(c) of the Operating Agreement expresses the members' expectation that other members or managers (Directors) of North Star will not willfully fail to deal fairly with the LLC in a matter in which the member or manager has a material conflict of interest,…”
Penebaker, Khary v. Hitt, Andrew (W.D. Wis. 2023). · cites it 2× “1 Plaintiffs also allege that defendants violated Wis. Stat. § 5.10 , which provides that the state’s presidential electors are chosen by statewide vote, and Wis.”
In re: Wisconsin & Milwaukee Hotel LLC (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2026). · cites it 2× “710, at §5.10. The third amended plan contemplated proposing for court approval auction procedures under which the debtor’s principal owner would make an $8 million stalking-horse bid, subject to a breakup fee of $280 thousand, and other bidders had to pay in cash and show the…”
A-S v. Aurora Health Care (E.D. Wis. 2021). “However, more recently, particularly in the wake of the Amara decision, many courts have taken a more nuanced view of the issue and have been willing to permit plaintiffs to include both alternative grounds for their action in the complaint stage of proceedings.”
— Wis. Stat. § 5.10(b)(10) — 1 case
In re: Wisconsin & Milwaukee Hotel LLC (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2026). “853 at §5.10, p.23. The amended plan further provides that the debtor’s current owner, Jackson Street Management, LLC (JSM), has offered to pay $8 million for the equity in the reorganized debtor.”
— Wis. Stat. § 5.10(c) — 2 cases
Daniel Marx v. Richard L. Morris, 925 N.W.2d 112 (Wis. 2019). “Furthermore, Section 5.10(c) of the Operating Agreement expresses the members' expectation that other members or managers (Directors) of North Star will not willfully fail to deal fairly with the LLC in a matter in which the member or manager has a material conflict of interest,…”
Daniel Marx v. Richard L. Morris (Wis. 2019). “Furthermore, Section 5.10(c) of the Operating Agreement expresses the members' expectation that other members or managers (Directors) of North Star will not willfully fail to deal fairly with the LLC in a matter in which the member or manager has a material conflict of interest,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.