Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 5.18 (2026)
Enforcement of division requirement
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
5.185.18 Enforcement of division requirement. If any municipality fails to comply with s. 5.15, the county in which the municipality is located or any elector of the municipality may submit to the circuit court for any county in which the municipality is located within 14 days from the expiration of the 60-day period under s. 5.15 (1) (b) a proposed plan for the division of the municipality into wards in compliance with this section. If the circuit court finds that the existing division of the municipality into wards fails to comply with s. 5.15, it shall review the plan submitted by the petitioner and after reasonable notice to the municipality may promulgate the plan, or any other plan in compliance with s. 5.15, as a temporary ward plan for the municipality to remain in effect until superseded by a ward plan enacted or adopted by the governing body in compliance with s. 5.15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013).
Marshall Schinner v. Michael Gundrum, 2013 WI 71 (Wis. 2013). “Anderson, Wisconsin Insurance Law § 5.18, at 26 (6th ed. 2012) ("The difficulty comes in determining .”
City of Janesville v. Cnty. of Rock, 319 N.W.2d 891 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “) Section 5.18(1) refers to the division into wards under sec.”
Mireles v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, 2000 WI 96 (Wis. 2000). “Worker's Compensation Handbook § 5.18. Scheduled injuries are enumerated in Wis.”
Chesemore v. All. Holdings, Inc., 276 F.R.D. 506 (W.D. Wis. 2011). “Specifically, certain pre-merger accounts are “guaranteed” under § 5.18 of the Traehte ESOP, so that the fair market value of the stocks of these accounts has a “floor” of 80% of the “balance of the Participant’s Pre-merger Guaranteed Account.”
Ramirez, Felix v. Wisconsin Masons Welfare Fund (W.D. Wis. 2023). “1-1, § 5.18. The trust agreement provides a process by which a participating union may withdraw.”
— Wis. Stat. § 5.18(1) — 1 case
City of Janesville v. Cnty. of Rock, 319 N.W.2d 891 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “) Section 5.18(1) refers to the division into wards under sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.