Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 60.81 (2026)
Population; use of federal census
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60.8160.81 Population; use of federal census. If the census of a town is required, the last federal census, including a special federal census, if any, shall be used.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1959–2011 · leading case: City of Madison v. Town of Fitchburg, 332 N.W.2d 782 (Wis. 1983).
City of Madison v. Town of Fitchburg, 332 N.W.2d 782 (Wis. 1983). “On March 24, 1980, a petition requesting an incorporation referendum for Fitchburg under sec. 60.81, Stats., was filed with the Fitchburg Town Clerk.”
City of Madison v. Town of Madison, 377 N.W.2d 221 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “The Town of Madison appeals from a declaratory judgment invalidating its efforts to incorporate as a city pursuant to sec. 60.81, Stats. (1981-82). 1 The issue is whether sec.”
City of Waukesha v. Salbashian, 382 N.W.2d 52 (Wis. 1986). “Zick, in which the court ruled that the Town of Pewaukee's attempt to incorporate as a fourth-class city under sec. 60.81, Stats., 1981-82, was invalid because Pewaukee is not adjacent to a first-class city.”
In Re Incorporation of Town of Fitchburg, 299 N.W.2d 199 (Wis. 1980). “On March 24, 1980, a petition was filed with the clerk of the Town of Fitchburg (Town) seeking an incorporation *637 referendum pursuant to sec. 60.81, Stats. [1] Acting upon that petition, the Town passed a resolution on March 31, 1980, setting forth the wards and boundaries of…”
Foley-Ciccantelli v. Bishop's Grove Condo. Ass'n, 2011 WI 36 (Wis. 2011). “2d 782 (1983), a declaratory judgment action, the issue was whether the City of Madison had standing to challenge an incorporation proceeding under Wis. Stat. § 60.81 (1981). Standing did not turn directly on a statute.”
City of Milwaukee v. Town of Oak Creek, 98 N.W.2d 469 (Wis. 1959). “In view of our decision, all other questions become moot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.