Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 66.0313 (2026)
Law enforcement; mutual assistance
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
66.0313(1)(a)(a) “Law enforcement agency” has the meaning given in s. 165.83 (1) (b) and includes a tribal law enforcement agency.
66.0313(2)(2) Except as provided in sub. (4), upon the request of any law enforcement agency, including county law enforcement agencies as provided in s. 59.28 (2), the law enforcement personnel of any other law enforcement agency may assist the requesting agency within the latter’s jurisdiction, notwithstanding any other jurisdictional provision. For purposes of ss. 895.35 and 895.46, law enforcement personnel, while acting in response to a request for assistance, shall be deemed employees of the requesting agency and, to the extent that those sections apply to law enforcement personnel and a law enforcement agency acting under or affected by this section, ss. 895.35 and 895.46 shall apply to tribal law enforcement personnel and a tribal law enforcement agency acting under or affected by this section.
66.0313(3)(3) The provisions of s. 66.0513 apply to this section and, to the extent that s. 66.0513 applies to law enforcement personnel and a law enforcement agency acting under or affected by this section, it applies to tribal law enforcement personnel and a tribal law enforcement agency acting under or affected by this section.
66.0313(4)(4) A law enforcement agency, other than a tribal law enforcement agency, may not respond to a request for assistance from a tribal law enforcement agency at a location outside the law enforcement agency’s territorial jurisdiction unless all of the following apply:
66.0313(4)(a)1.1. The governing body of the tribe that created the tribal law enforcement agency adopts and has in effect a resolution that includes a statement that the tribe waives its sovereign immunity to the extent necessary to allow the enforcement in the courts of this state of its liability under sub. (2) and s. 66.0513 or another resolution that the department of justice determines will reasonably allow the enforcement in the courts of this state of the tribe’s liability under sub. (2) and s. 66.0513.
66.0313(4)(a)2.2. The tribal law enforcement agency or the tribe that created the tribal law enforcement agency maintains liability insurance that does all of the following:
66.0313(4)(a)2.a.a. Covers the tribal law enforcement agency for its liability under sub. (2) and s. 66.0513.
66.0313(4)(a)2.c.c. Provides that the insurer, in defending a claim against the policy, may not raise the defense of sovereign immunity of the insured up to the limits of the policy.
66.0313(4)(a)3.3. The law enforcement agency and the tribal law enforcement agency have in place an agreement under which the law enforcement agency accepts liability under sub. (2) and s. 66.0513 for instances in which it responds to a request for assistance from the tribal law enforcement agency.
66.0313(4)(b)(b) The tribal law enforcement agency requesting assistance has provided to the department of justice a copy of the resolution under par. (a) 1., proof of insurance under par. (a) 2., or a copy of the agreement under par. (a) 3., and the department of justice has posted either a copy of the document or notice of the document on the Internet site it maintains for exchanging information with law enforcement agencies.
66.0313 AnnotationThe statutes do not permit the creation of a separate regional law enforcement agency; neither the sheriff nor the county board has power to delegate supervisory or law enforcement powers to such an agency. 63 Atty. Gen. 596.
66.0313 AnnotationA request for assistance may be implicit. United States v. Mattes, 687 F.2d 1039 (1982).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2001–2020 · leading case: State v. Keith, 2003 WI App 47 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Keith, 2003 WI App 47 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003). “2 For example, Wis. Stat. § 66.0313 provides that law enforcement personnel may, outside their jurisdiction, assist other law enforcement upon request.”
State v. Haynes, 2001 WI App 266 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “Finally, officer Infalt's assistance to Grabski was appropriate pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 66.0313 . The judgments of conviction are affirmed.”
O'Grady, Michael v. Garrigan, Daniel (W.D. Wis. 2020). “See Wis. Stat. § 66.0313 (2). Next, O’ Grady argues that no school district policy authorizes a high school principal to ask law enforcement to conduct a drug sniff, and that district policy 5771 permits canine searches on campus only at the request of the district administrator.”
Milwaukee Cnty. v. Juneau Cnty., 2004 WI App 23 (Wis. Ct. App. 2004). “(2) Upon the request of any law enforcement agency, including county law enforcement agencies as provided in s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.