Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 704 — LANDLORD AND TENANT
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 704.03 (2026)

Requirement of writing for rental agreements and termination

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
704.03704.03 Requirement of writing for rental agreements and termination.
704.03(1)(1) Original agreement. Notwithstanding s. 704.02, a lease for more than a year, or a contract to make such a lease, is not enforceable unless it meets the requirements of s. 706.02 and in addition sets forth the amount of rent or other consideration, the time of commencement and expiration of the lease, and a reasonably definite description of the premises, or unless a writing, including by means of electronic mail or facsimile transmission, signed by the landlord and the tenant sets forth the amount of rent or other consideration, the duration of the lease, and a reasonably definite description of the premises and the commencement date is established by entry of the tenant into possession under the writing. Sections 704.05 and 704.07 govern as to matters within the scope of such sections and not provided for in such written lease or contract.
704.03(2)(2) Entry under unenforceable lease. If a tenant enters into possession under a lease for more than one year which does not meet the requirements of sub. (1), and the tenant pays rent on a periodic basis, the tenant becomes a periodic tenant. If the premises in such case are used for residential purposes and the rent is payable monthly, the tenant becomes a month-to-month tenant; but if the use is agricultural or nonresidential, the tenant becomes a year-to-year tenant without regard to the rent-payment periods. Except for duration of the tenancy and matters within the scope of ss. 704.05 and 704.07, the tenancy is governed by the terms and conditions agreed upon. Notice as provided in s. 704.19 is necessary to terminate such a periodic tenancy.
704.03(3)(3) Assignment. An assignment by the tenant of a leasehold interest which has an unexpired period of more than one year is not enforceable against the assignor unless the assignment is in writing reasonably identifying the lease and signed by the assignor; and any agreement to assume the obligations of the original lease which has an unexpired period of more than one year is not enforceable unless in writing signed by the assignee.
704.03(4)(4) Termination of written lease prior to normal expiration date. An agreement to terminate a tenancy more than one year prior to the expiration date specified in a valid written lease is not enforceable unless it is in writing signed by both parties. Any other agreement between the landlord and tenant to terminate a lease prior to its normal expiration date, or to terminate a periodic tenancy or tenancy at will without the statutory notice required by s. 704.19 may be either oral or written. Nothing herein prevents surrender by operation of law.
704.03(5)(5) Proof. In any case where a lease or agreement is not in writing signed by both parties but is enforceable under this section, the lease or agreement must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.
704.03 HistoryHistory: 1993 a. 486; 2011 a. 143.
704.03 Cross-referenceCross-reference: See also ss. ATCP 134.03, 134.04, 134.08, and 134.09, Wis. adm. code.
704.03 AnnotationIf there is no written lease, s. 704.07 applies to the obligation to make repairs. For there to be a remedy for a breach of a duty to repair other than that provided in s. 704.07, the obligation must be in a written lease signed by both parties. Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass’n, 226 Wis. 2d 105, 593 N.W.2d 895 (Ct. App. 1999), 98-2445.
704.03 AnnotationThe unambiguous language of sub. (1) requires only a “reasonably definite” description of the premises, not a legal or pictorial description. In this case, the description was reasonably definite not only because it set forth the address and parcel number of the property to be leased, but it also provided that the lease applied to all the land and buildings on that property. As such, the description left no room for reasonable dispute as to the property that was subject to the lease. MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin Co., 2025 WI App 18, 415 Wis. 2d 590, 19 N.W.3d 582, 23-1982.
704.03 AnnotationThe phrase “amount of rent” under sub. (1) means the total number of dollars to be paid in a period for the possession and use of the property. In this case, the lease did not satisfy the amount of rent requirement under sub. (1) when the lease failed on its face to state the amount of base rent owed, it failed on its face to provide all of the information necessary to calculate the base rent, and it failed to provide a foundation, link, or key to extrinsic documents that could supply the square footage necessary to calculate the amount of rent owed as base rent. MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin Co., 2025 WI App 18, 415 Wis. 2d 590, 19 N.W.3d 582, 23-1982.
Down
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
 View toggle
 Go to top of document
Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Search in this agency
 Search in this chapter group
 Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Cross references for section
 Acts affecting this section
 References to this
 1970 Statutes Annotations
 Appellate Court Citations
 Administrative Code Index
Reference lines
 Clear highlighting
704.03 AnnotationBefore parol evidence can be used in the context of the statute of frauds, the description in the conveyance must furnish some foundation, link, or key to the extrinsic testimony that identifies the property. The foundation, link, or key rule applies to the statute of frauds requirements for all land transactions, including leases exceeding a one-year term. MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin Co., 2025 WI App 18, 415 Wis. 2d 590, 19 N.W.3d 582, 23-1982.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass'n, 593 N.W.2d 895 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass'n, 593 N.W.2d 895 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 17× “The association moved for partial summary judgment, contending that the statute of frauds, § 704.03, Stats., barred enforcement of the written lease's terms.”
Michael F. Connor & Jane H. Connor v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 218 F.3d 733 (7th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3× “Wisconsin’s statute on rental agreements requires that for a lease with a duration of more than one year to be enforceable, it must meet the state Statute of Frauds, Wis.”
Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 520 N.W.2d 99 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 3× “Subsequently, Schneider rejected Kersten's removal notice, stating that under § 704.03(2), STATS., it was a yéar-to-year tenant.”
MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 63× “§ 704.03 is by an equation, provided that the factors needed in the equation to determine the amount of rent can be ascertained by a “disinterested third party.”
Rossow Oil Co. v. Heiman, 242 N.W.2d 176 (Wis. 1976). “Heiman is not attempting to establish the definite terms of a contract governing use of the site and then attempting to justify statute of frauds noncompliance by showing acts specifically referable to duties under such conveyance contract; rather, he is asserting detrimental…”
Maryland Arms Ltd. P'ship v. Connell, 2009 WI App 87 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “§ 704.03. Stated another way, although the landlord may have the duty to repair under § 704.”
Matter of Northwood Indus., Inc., 25 B.R. 210 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1982). · cites it 2× “Under Wis.Stat. § 704.03, an assignment of a remaining period of a lease in excess of 1 year must be in writing.”
Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Waters (In Re Waters), 60 B.R. 339 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1986). · cites it 2× “Section 704.03(5) of the Wisconsin Statutes states, “In any case where a lease or agreement is not in writing signed by both parties but is enforceable under this section, the lease or agreement must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”
Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Leistikow, 230 N.W.2d 736 (Wis. 1975). “In the fourth defense, the defendants allege that Clark is estopped from bringing this action because they were *237 induced to enter the agreements by representations that the defendants would be able to occupy the premises involved as long as they did well as dealers and ran…”
In Re Carley Capital Grp., 117 B.R. 951 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1990). “the same_” (The current Wis.Stat. § 706.01(4) provides that “A ‘conveyance’ is a written instrument, evidencing a transaction governed by this chapter, which satisfies the requirements of s.”
Koble Investments v. Elicia Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (Wis. 2026). · cites it 3× “§ 704.03(2). ¶29 Attorney Miller argues a tenant has shown “a per se pecuniary harm” whenever a court determines a lease is invalid “from its inception,” but neither Marquart nor Attorney Miller ever demonstrated how paying rent amounted to a loss, much less one caused by…”
Carla J. Carns v. Rodney A. Carns (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 10× “§ 704.03. We reject Rodney’s broad assertions that claim preclusion applies to all of Carla’s claims in the instant action, which leaves the periodic tenancy issue that we address separately below.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Wis. Stat. § 704.03(1) — 4 cases
Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass'n, 593 N.W.2d 895 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “The association moved for partial summary judgment, contending that the statute of frauds, § 704.03, Stats., barred enforcement of the written lease's terms.”
MPI Wright LLC v. Goodin Co. (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 704.03 is by an equation, provided that the factors needed in the equation to determine the amount of rent can be ascertained by a “disinterested third party.”
Maryland Arms Ltd. P'ship v. Connell, 2009 WI App 87 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 704.03. Stated another way, although the landlord may have the duty to repair under § 704.”
Carla J. Carns v. Rodney A. Carns (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 704.03. We reject Rodney’s broad assertions that claim preclusion applies to all of Carla’s claims in the instant action, which leaves the periodic tenancy issue that we address separately below.”
— Wis. Stat. § 704.03(2) — 4 cases
Halverson v. River Falls Youth Hockey Ass'n, 593 N.W.2d 895 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999). “The association moved for partial summary judgment, contending that the statute of frauds, § 704.03, Stats., barred enforcement of the written lease's terms.”
Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 520 N.W.2d 99 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “Subsequently, Schneider rejected Kersten's removal notice, stating that under § 704.03(2), STATS., it was a yéar-to-year tenant.”
Koble Investments v. Elicia Marquardt, 2026 WI 19 (Wis. 2026). “§ 704.03(2). ¶29 Attorney Miller argues a tenant has shown “a per se pecuniary harm” whenever a court determines a lease is invalid “from its inception,” but neither Marquart nor Attorney Miller ever demonstrated how paying rent amounted to a loss, much less one caused by…”
Carla J. Carns v. Rodney A. Carns (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 704.03. We reject Rodney’s broad assertions that claim preclusion applies to all of Carla’s claims in the instant action, which leaves the periodic tenancy issue that we address separately below.”
— Wis. Stat. § 704.03(5) — 1 case
Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Waters (In Re Waters), 60 B.R. 339 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1986). “Section 704.03(5) of the Wisconsin Statutes states, “In any case where a lease or agreement is not in writing signed by both parties but is enforceable under this section, the lease or agreement must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.