Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 755.09 (2026)

Office, where kept

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
755.09755.09Office, where kept.
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
View toggle
Go to top of document

Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Search in this agency
Search in this chapter group
Search in this chapter
Search in this section
Cross references for section
Acts affecting this section
References to this
1970 Statutes Annotations
Appellate Court Citations
Administrative Code Index

Reference lines
Clear highlighting
755.09(1)(1)The governing body of the city, village, or town shall provide the judge with an office or appropriate work space other than at a place prohibited under sub. (2).
755.09(2)(2)No judge may keep his or her office or hold court in any tavern, or in any room in which intoxicating liquors are sold, or in any room connecting with a tavern or room in which intoxicating liquors are sold.
755.09 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 187 s. 94; 1977 c. 305 s. 64; Stats. 1977 s. 755.09; 1997 a. 27; 2009 a. 402.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: City of Milwaukee v. Wroten, 466 N.W.2d 861 (Wis. 1991).
City of Milwaukee v. Wroten, 466 N.W.2d 861 (Wis. 1991). · cites it 4× “" Section 755.09(2), Stats. [9] A facial reading of the ordinance in question in this case might suggest that incarceration for a period of up to six months—a criminal penalty—might directly result if a defendant were to be unsuccessful on the merits.”
— Wis. Stat. § 755.09(2) — 1 case
City of Milwaukee v. Wroten, 466 N.W.2d 861 (Wis. 1991). “" Section 755.09(2), Stats. [9] A facial reading of the ordinance in question in this case might suggest that incarceration for a period of up to six months—a criminal penalty—might directly result if a defendant were to be unsuccessful on the merits.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.