Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 788.14 (2026)
Papers filed with motion regarding award; entry of judgment, effect of judgment
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
788.14(1)(1) Any party to a proceeding for an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award shall, at the time the order is filed with the clerk of circuit court for the entry of judgment thereon, also file the following papers with the clerk of circuit court:
788.14(1)(a)(a) The agreement, the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire, and each written extension of the time, if any, within which to make the award;
788.14(1)(c)(c) Each notice, affidavit or other paper used upon an application to confirm, modify or correct the award, and a copy of each order of the court upon such an application.
788.14(2)(2) The judgment shall be entered in the judgment and lien docket as if it was rendered in an action.
788.14(3)(3) The judgment so entered shall have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action; and it may be enforced as if it had been rendered in an action in the court in which it is entered.
788.14 AnnotationSection 806.07 (1) can be used to reopen judgments confirming arbitration awards. Under sub. (3), a judgment confirming an arbitration award shall “have the same force and effect, in all respects, as, and be subject to all the provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action.” Sands v. Menard, Inc., 2013 WI App 47, 347 Wis. 2d 446, 831 N.W.2d 805, 12-0286.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2004–2018 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Franke v. Franke, 2004 WI 8 (Wis. 2004).
In Re Marriage of Franke v. Franke, 2004 WI 8 (Wis. 2004). “Franke relies on Wis. Stat. § 788.14 , which provides that a judgment incorporating an arbitral award has "the same force and effect, in all *376 respects, as, and [is] subject to all provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action" and argues that a judgment confirming…”
Schouten v. Jakubiak (In re Jakubiak), 591 B.R. 364 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2018). “Wis. Stat. § 788.14 (3) ; see also Manu-Tronics, Inc.”
Sands v. Menard, Inc., 2013 WI App 47 (Wis. Ct. App. 2013). “Stat. § 806.07 (1), just like any other judgment.”
— Wis. Stat. § 788.14(3) — 1 case
In Re Marriage of Franke v. Franke, 2004 WI 8 (Wis. 2004). “Franke relies on Wis. Stat. § 788.14 , which provides that a judgment incorporating an arbitral award has "the same force and effect, in all *376 respects, as, and [is] subject to all provisions of law relating to, a judgment in an action" and argues that a judgment confirming…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.