Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 800 — MUNICIPAL COURT PROCEDURE
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 800.02 (2026)

Form of citation, complaint, summons and warrant in municipal ordinance violation cases

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
800.02800.02 Form of citation, complaint, summons and warrant in municipal ordinance violation cases.
800.02(1)(1) Action. An action in municipal court for violation of a municipal ordinance is a civil action, and the forfeiture or penalty imposed by any ordinance of the municipality may be collected in an action in the name of the municipality.
800.02(2)(2) Form of citation or complaint.
800.02(2)(a)(a) The citation or complaint shall contain the name of a law enforcement officer, attorney representing the municipality, or, if applicable, a conservation warden. In addition, the governing body of a municipality authorized to adopt the use of citations or complaints may designate by ordinance or resolution other municipal officials who are authorized to issue and be named in citations or complaints with respect to ordinances which are directly related to the official responsibilities of the officials. Officials granted the authority to issue and be named in citations and complaints may delegate, with the approval of the governing body, the authority to employees. Authority delegated to an official or employee may be revoked only in the same manner by which it is conferred.
800.02(2)(ag)(ag) The citation or complaint shall contain substantially the following information:
800.02(2)(ag)1.1. The name, address and date of birth of the defendant.
800.02(2)(ag)1m.1m. The identification of any permit issued to the defendant, or license number of the defendant, if applicable.
800.02(2)(ag)2.2. The name and department of the issuing officer.
800.02(2)(ag)3.3. The violation alleged, the time and place of the occurrence of the violation, a statement that the defendant committed the violation, the ordinance violated, and a description of the violation in language that can be readily understood.
800.02(2)(ag)4.4. A notice to appear at a date, time and place for the court appearance, and a statement as to whether the appearance is mandated by the judge.
800.02(2)(ag)5.5. Provisions for amount of deposit and stipulation in lieu of a court appearance, if applicable.
800.02(2)(ag)6.6. Notice that the defendant may make a deposit and thereby obtain release if an arrest has been made.
800.02(2)(ag)7.7. Notice that the defendant may, in writing, prior to the court appearance, enter a plea of not guilty.
800.02(2)(ag)8.8. Notice that, if the defendant makes a deposit and fails to appear in court at the time fixed in the citation, the defendant is deemed to have tendered a plea of no contest and submits to a forfeiture, plus costs, fees, and surcharges imposed under ch. 814, not to exceed the amount of the deposit. The notice shall also state that the court may decide to summon the defendant rather than accept the deposit and plea.
Down
Loading...
Loading...
× Details for
PDF view
Link (Permanent link)
Bookmark this location
 View toggle
 Go to top of document
Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Search in this agency
 Search in this chapter group
 Search in this chapter
 Search in this section
 Cross references for section
 Acts affecting this section
 References to this
 1970 Statutes Annotations
 Appellate Court Citations
 Administrative Code Index
Reference lines
 Clear highlighting
800.02(2)(ag)9.9. Notice that if the defendant does not make a deposit and fails to appear in court at the time fixed in the citation, the court may issue a summons or a warrant for the defendant’s arrest or may enter a default judgment against the defendant.
800.02(2)(ag)9m.9m. In an action against a corporation organized under ch. 180 or 181, or against a limited liability company organized under ch. 183, a statement of the corporate or company existence and whether the corporation or company is a domestic or foreign corporation or limited liability company.
800.02(2)(ag)10.10. Any other pertinent information.
800.02(2)(am)(am) In 1st class cities, all of the written information required under par. (a), except the information under par. (ag) 1. to 4., 9m., and 10., shall be printed in Spanish on a separate sheet attached to the citation or provided in Spanish on the citation.
800.02(2)(b)(b) Except for parking violations, in traffic regulation actions in municipal court, the uniform traffic citation specified in s. 345.11 shall be used in lieu of the citation form specified in par. (ag). In actions for violations of local ordinances enacted in accordance with s. 23.33 (11) (am), 23.335 (21) (a), or 30.77, the citation form specified in s. 23.54 shall be used in lieu of the citation form specified in par. (ag).
800.02(4)(4) Summons form.
800.02(4)(a)(a) The summons shall be signed by a municipal judge or by the attorney who is prosecuting the case in municipal court and shall contain the following information:
800.02(4)(a)1.1. The title of the cause, specifying the name of the court and county in which the action is brought and the names of all parties to the action.
800.02(4)(a)2.2. A direction summoning and requiring the defendant to appear in a specified court on a particular date not less than 10 days following service of the summons to answer the accompanying citation or complaint.
800.02(4)(a)3.3. A notice that in case of failure to appear, judgment may be rendered against the defendant according to the demand of the citation or complaint, or the court may issue a warrant for the defendant’s arrest.
800.02(4)(b)(b) In 1st class cities, all of the written information required under par. (a) shall be printed in Spanish on a separate sheet attached to the summons or provided in Spanish on the summons.
800.02(5)(5) Warrant form. The warrant shall be in the name of the state of Wisconsin, shall be directed to all law enforcement officers in the state, may be addressed to any law enforcement officer in the state, may specify geographical limits for enforcement of the warrant, and shall be signed by the municipal judge who authorizes its issuance or contain a computer-generated facsimile of the judge’s signature. A municipal judge may authorize the issuance of a warrant under this chapter by using a computer or other electronic media. The municipal judge shall make the authorization so that it is accessible to the attorney for the municipality and law enforcement officers. A law enforcement officer shall convert the municipal judge’s authorization to a paper copy of the warrant before serving the warrant. The warrant shall contain or have attached to it the following information:
800.02(5)(a)(a) The name of the defendant.
800.02(5)(b)(b) The offense alleged.
800.02(5)(c)(c) A copy of the citation or complaint.
800.02(5)(d)(d) A finding of probable cause that the defendant committed the offense.
800.02(5)(e)(e) A command to arrest the defendant and bring him or her before the municipal judge or other municipal judge or judge of the county.
800.02(5)(f)(f) The date of issuance.
800.02(6)(6) Authority to arrest without a warrant. A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a municipal ordinance if the arresting officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is violating or has violated the ordinance.
800.02 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 305; 1979 c. 22; 1979 c. 32 s. 68; 1979 c. 266; Stats. 1979 s. 800.02; 1981 c. 317; 1983 a. 535; 1987 a. 27; 1987 a. 200 s. 4; 1987 a. 389; 1989 a. 170; 1991 a. 39, 40; 1993 a. 16, 112, 320, 437; 1997 a. 27; 1999 a. 9; 2001 a. 16; 2003 a. 139; 2009 a. 402; 2013 a. 107; 2015 a. 170.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: City of Milwaukee v. Nelson, 439 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Milwaukee v. Nelson, 439 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1989). · cites it 26× “It also found the ordinance and sec. 800.02(6), Stats. 1987-88 [2] which permits arrest for ordinance violations, contravened the fourth amendment of the *439 United States Constitution [3] and art.”
City of Milwaukee v. Wroten, 466 N.W.2d 861 (Wis. 1991). · cites it 4× “Particularly if the municipal judge is not an attorney, his potential disadvantage in being able to address the issue will be reinforced and exaggerated by his practical lack of familiarity and experience with constitutional issues.”
State v. Pallone, 2000 WI 77 (Wis. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 800.02(6) provides that, "A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a municipal ordinance.”
State v. Wilks, 345 N.W.2d 498 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “See sec. 800.02(6), Stats. Therefore, we hold that the ordinance does not violate the probable cause requirements of the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions.”
Butler v. Oak Creek-Franklin Sch. Dist., 116 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (E.D. Wis. 2000). · cites it 7× “This suspension was supported by police reports indicating that Butler had been arrested and given citations for a total of three alleged municipal ordinance violations committed on July 4 and July 17.”
Butler v. Oak Creek-Franklin Sch. Dist., 172 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (E.D. Wis. 2001). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 800.02 (6) (requiring “reasonable grounds” for arrest on suspicion of violating municipal ordinance); City of Milwaukee v.”
State v. Kramsvogel, 369 N.W.2d 145 (Wis. 1985). “” Accord, sec. 800.02(1), Stats., which provides, “800.”
Haas v. Wisconsin, 109 F. App'x 107 (7th Cir. 2004). “Haas “spurned” his opportunities to be heard on these very matters in state court.”
State v. Bailey, 2009 WI App 140 (Wis. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Moreover, Wis. Stat. § 800.02 (6) authorizes a municipal police officer to arrest a person without a warrant based on reasonable grounds to believe that the person is violating a municipal ordinance.”
City of Kenosha v. Jensen, 516 N.W.2d 4 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “" From this, Jensen observes that municipal courts are guided by different procedures than courts of record. Chapter 800, Stats., provides the procedures for municipal courts to follow.”
Hass v. Wisconsin, 241 F. Supp. 2d 922 (E.D. Wis. 2003). · cites it 6× “However, plaintiff could have raised the claims he raises here in municipal court, see Wis. Stat. §§ 800.02 (1), 800.04, 800.095, 800.”
Demonta Antonio Hall v. Wisconsin Dep't of Just., 2020 WI App 12 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 800.02(1). Among other information, citations and summons include the date, time, and place for appearance.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Wis. Stat. § 800.02(1) — 5 cases
City of Milwaukee v. Wroten, 466 N.W.2d 861 (Wis. 1991). “Particularly if the municipal judge is not an attorney, his potential disadvantage in being able to address the issue will be reinforced and exaggerated by his practical lack of familiarity and experience with constitutional issues.”
State v. Kramsvogel, 369 N.W.2d 145 (Wis. 1985). “” Accord, sec. 800.02(1), Stats., which provides, “800.”
City of Kenosha v. Jensen, 516 N.W.2d 4 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “" From this, Jensen observes that municipal courts are guided by different procedures than courts of record. Chapter 800, Stats., provides the procedures for municipal courts to follow.”
Demonta Antonio Hall v. Wisconsin Dep't of Just., 2020 WI App 12 (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 800.02(1). Among other information, citations and summons include the date, time, and place for appearance.”
Hass v. Wisconsin, 241 F. Supp. 2d 922 (E.D. Wis. 2003). “However, plaintiff could have raised the claims he raises here in municipal court, see Wis. Stat. §§ 800.02 (1), 800.04, 800.095, 800.”
— Wis. Stat. § 800.02(2)(a) — 1 case
Hass v. Wisconsin, 241 F. Supp. 2d 922 (E.D. Wis. 2003). “However, plaintiff could have raised the claims he raises here in municipal court, see Wis. Stat. §§ 800.02 (1), 800.04, 800.095, 800.”
— Wis. Stat. § 800.02(4)(a) — 1 case
Hass v. Wisconsin, 241 F. Supp. 2d 922 (E.D. Wis. 2003). “However, plaintiff could have raised the claims he raises here in municipal court, see Wis. Stat. §§ 800.02 (1), 800.04, 800.095, 800.”
— Wis. Stat. § 800.02(5) — 1 case
Oconomowoc Area Sch. Dist. v. Gregory L. Cota, 2025 WI 11 (Wis. 2025).
— Wis. Stat. § 800.02(6) — 4 cases
City of Milwaukee v. Nelson, 439 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1989). “It also found the ordinance and sec. 800.02(6), Stats. 1987-88 [2] which permits arrest for ordinance violations, contravened the fourth amendment of the *439 United States Constitution [3] and art.”
State v. Pallone, 2000 WI 77 (Wis. 2000). “§ 800.02(6) provides that, "A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a municipal ordinance.”
State v. Wilks, 345 N.W.2d 498 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984). “See sec. 800.02(6), Stats. Therefore, we hold that the ordinance does not violate the probable cause requirements of the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions.”
Butler v. Oak Creek-Franklin Sch. Dist., 116 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (E.D. Wis. 2000). “This suspension was supported by police reports indicating that Butler had been arrested and given citations for a total of three alleged municipal ordinance violations committed on July 4 and July 17.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.