Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 885.43 (2026)

Notice of videotape deposition

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

885.43885.43 Notice of videotape deposition. Every notice for the taking of a videotape deposition and subpoena for attendance at such deposition shall state that the deposition is to be visually recorded and preserved pursuant to the provisions of ss. 885.44 and 885.46.

885.43 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 67 Wis. 2d 585, xii (1975); Sup. Ct. Order, 141 Wis. 2d xxxv (1987).

885.43 NoteJudicial Council Committee’s Note, 1975: This provision recognizes that there should be adequate notice that a deposition by videotape is to be taken. The section requires that the notice make reference to the provisions on filing and preserving of videotape depositions. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1976]

885.43 NoteJudicial Council Note, 1988: Videotape depositions are no longer required to be filed in court. [Re Order effective Jan. 1, 1988]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1982–2000 · leading case: Gieseke v. Dep't of Transp., 426 N.W.2d 79 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gieseke v. Dep't of Transp., 426 N.W.2d 79 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 10× “The state argues that the notice provision of sec. 885.43, Stats., [3] applies to this videotape because it is "other evidence" within the meaning of sec.”

State Ex Rel. Mitsubishi Heavy Indus. Am., Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee Cnty., 2000 WI 16 (Wis. 2000). · cites it 4× “1988 Judicial Council Note to Wis. Stat. § 885.43 . [6] We express no opinion concerning whether the parties may release to the media any depositions and discovery material the parties or their attorneys may have in their possession.”

State v. Haefer, 328 N.W.2d 894 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982). “Sections 885.43 and 885.44 contain requirements for notice and procedure used for taking depositions.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.