Wis. Stat. » CHAPTER 910 — EVIDENCE — CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS AND PHOTOGRAPHS
Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 910.06 (2026)

Summaries

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
910.06910.06 Summaries. The contents of voluminous writings, recordings or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary or calculation. The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. The judge may order that they be produced in court.
910.06 HistoryHistory: Sup. Ct. Order, 59 Wis. 2d R1, R362 (1973).
910.06 AnnotationA chart prepared by the prosecutor during trial, in the jury’s presence, to categorize testimony was not a summary under this section, but was a “pedagogical device” admissible within the court’s discretion under s. 906.11. State v. Olson, 217 Wis. 2d 730, 579 N.W.2d 802 (Ct. App. 1998), 96-2142.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1991–2018 · leading case: State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79 (Wis. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79 (Wis. 2006). · cites it 4× “See Wis. Stat. § 910.06 (content of voluminous writings, recording, or photographs may be presented in summary form).”
Gross v. Woodman's Food Mkt., Inc., 2002 WI App 295 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 5× “§ 910.06, [15] and that Gross had in any event provided that documentation.”
State v. Olson, 579 N.W.2d 802 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 15× “These standards apply to a trial court's discretionary decision to admit a summary chart, whether under § 910.06, Stats., see United States v. Winn, 948 F.”
City of Menomonie v. Evensen Dodge, Inc., 471 N.W.2d 513 (Wis. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 3× “03(6) or sec. 910.06, Stats., we do not address Q& *239 B's contention that it was also admissible as a party admission or as a business record.”
Greene v. James Wiese, 918 N.W.2d 643 (Wis. Ct. App. 2018). “§ 910.06. We agree with the trial court that they were received into evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.