Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 940.07 (2026)

Homicide resulting from negligent control of vicious animal

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
940.07940.07 Homicide resulting from negligent control of vicious animal. Whoever knowing the vicious propensities of any animal intentionally allows it to go at large or keeps it without ordinary care, if such animal, while so at large or not confined, kills any human being who has taken all the precautions which the circumstances may permit to avoid such animal, is guilty of a Class G felony.
940.07 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 173; 2001 a. 109.
940.07 AnnotationThe common law “year-and-a-day rule” that no homicide is committed unless the victim dies within a year and a day after the injury is inflicted is abrogated, with prospective application only. State v. Picotte, 2003 WI 42, 261 Wis. 2d 249, 661 N.W.2d 381, 01-3063.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–1999 · leading case: State v. Bodoh, 582 N.W.2d 440 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Bodoh, 582 N.W.2d 440 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 24× “That statute is § 940.07, STATS., and provides as follows: Whoever knowing the vicious propensities of any animal intentionally allows it to go at large or keeps it without ordinary care, if such animal, while so at large or not confined, kills any human being who has taken all…”
State v. Bodoh, 595 N.W.2d 330 (Wis. 1999). · cites it 5× “Specifically, he relies on Wis. Stat. § 940.07 (reprinted below), 4 homicide resulting from *736 negligent control of vicious animal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.