Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 951.13 (2026)

Providing proper food and drink to confined animals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
951.13951.13 Providing proper food and drink to confined animals. No person owning or responsible for confining or impounding any animal may fail to supply the animal with a sufficient supply of food and water as prescribed in this section.
951.13(1)(1) Food. The food shall be sufficient to maintain all animals in good health.
951.13(2)(2) Water. If potable water is not accessible to the animals at all times, it shall be provided daily and in sufficient quantity for the health of the animal.
951.13 HistoryHistory: 1973 c. 314; 1983 a. 95; 1987 a. 332 s. 54; Stats. 1987 s. 951.13.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: Flint v. City of Milwaukee, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1032 (E.D. Wis. 2015).
Flint v. City of Milwaukee, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1032 (E.D. Wis. 2015). · cites it 3× “§§ 951.13, 951.14. Additionally, when speaking with Flint during her arrest, Detective Simmert told her she was being arrested because “the conditions inside of [the house] were deplorable, and that clearly she wasn’t caring for the animals.”
State v. Stone, 2004 MT 151 (Mont. 2004). “13 (1985) (now Wis. Stat. § 951.13 (2003)). Illinois’ statute, in Thornton , stated that “[n]o person or owner may beat, cruelly treat, torment, starve, overwork or otherwise abuse any animal.”
State v. Kuenzi, 2011 WI App 30 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “, Wis. Stat. § 951.13 . Thus, the provisions are not directed at the care and feeding of non-captive wild animals.”
State v. Christy Rose Tuchel (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 11× “§ 951.13. She also appeals an order denying her postconviction motion.”
Wis. Stat. § 951.13(1): 1 case
State v. Christy Rose Tuchel (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 951.13. She also appeals an order denying her postconviction motion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.