Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 973.057 (2026)

Global positioning system tracking surcharge

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
973.057973.057Global positioning system tracking surcharge.
973.057(1)(1)If a court convicts a person under s. 813.12 or 813.125, or a conforming municipal ordinance, the court shall impose a global positioning system tracking surcharge under ch. 814 of $200 for each offense.
973.057(2)(a)(a) If the surcharge is imposed by a court of record, after the court determines the amount due, the clerk of the court shall collect and transmit the amount to the county treasurer as provided in s. 59.40 (2) (m). The county treasurer shall then make payment to the secretary of administration as provided in s. 59.25 (3) (f) 2.
973.057(2)(b)(b) If the surcharge is imposed by a municipal court, after a determination by the court of the amount due, the court shall collect and transmit the amount to the treasurer of the county, city, town, or village, and that treasurer shall make payment to the secretary of administration as provided in s. 66.0114 (1) (bm).
973.057(3)(3)All moneys collected from global positioning system tracking surcharges shall be deposited by the secretary of administration in s. 20.410 (1) (gL) and utilized in accordance with s. 301.49.
973.057(4)(4)If the moneys collected under this section prove inadequate to fund the global positioning system tracking program under s. 301.49, the department may, by rule, increase the surcharge under sub. (1) by not more than 5 percent each year to cover the costs of the global positioning system tracking program.
973.057 HistoryHistory: 2011 a. 266; 2013 a. 165 s. 115
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: State v. Williams, 2017 WI App 46 (Wis. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Williams, 2017 WI App 46 (Wis. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Wis. Stat. § 973.057 . • The ignition interlock surcharge goes to the county treasury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.