Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 98.15 (2026)
False testing
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
98.15(1)(1) No person shall manipulate, underread or overread or make any false determination by the Babcock test or any other test used for determining the value of milk or cream. No person shall make any false record or report of the results of any such test.
98.15(2)(2) A district attorney to whom any violation of this section is reported shall cause appropriate actions or proceedings to be instituted for the collection of a forfeiture or fine or for the enforcement of other remedies. In any enforcement action the court may, in addition to any other penalty provided, order restitution to any party injured by violation of this section. If the violator is convicted of a crime, restitution shall be in accordance with s. 973.20.
98.15 AnnotationSub. (1) did not preclude prosecution for felony fraud under s. 943.20 (1) (d) when the state alleged that the defendant misrepresented the quality of milk sold. State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31, 299 Wis. 2d 251, 729 N.W.2d 784, 06-1180.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2007–2007 · leading case: State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007).
State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “The State argues the circuit court erred as a matter of law when it dismissed the felony complaint, after concluding the State must charge Ploeckelman under *256 Wis. Stat. § 98.15 (1), 2 which makes it a misdemeanor to manipulate the quality of milk samples.”
— Wis. Stat. § 98.15(1) — 1 case
State v. Ploeckelman, 2007 WI App 31 (Wis. Ct. App. 2007). “The State argues the circuit court erred as a matter of law when it dismissed the felony complaint, after concluding the State must charge Ploeckelman under *256 Wis. Stat. § 98.15 (1), 2 which makes it a misdemeanor to manipulate the quality of milk samples.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.