Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
"This act" means W.S. 1-37-101 through 1-37-115 and may be cited
as the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case: Reiman Corp. v. City of Cheyenne, 838 P.2d 1182 (Wyo. 1992).
Reiman Corp. v. City of Cheyenne, 838 P.2d 1182 (Wyo. 1992). · cites it 8× “That agreement has some potential for cognizance under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-37-101 to -115 (1988), but Reiman did not ask to have rights under the new agreement declared by the court.”
Britain v. Britain (In re Est. of Britain), 425 P.3d 978 (Wyo. 2018). · cites it 4× “Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-37-101 through 1-37-115 (LexisNexis 2017).”
State Ex Rel. Bayou Liquors, Inc. v. City of Casper, 906 P.2d 1046 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 7× “Whether the Wyoming Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, Wyo.Stat. §§ 1-37-101 et seq. (1988), gives Appellants *1048 standing to challenge the City of Casper's administrative decision? Appellee City of Casper raises two issues: 1.”
Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State, 645 P.2d 1163 (Wyo. 1982). · cites it 4× “1945 [§§ 1-37-101 to 1-37-115], shall be in accordance with these rules, and the right to trial by jury may be demanded under the circumstances and in the manner provided in Rules 38 and 39.”
City of Casper v. Holloway, 354 P.3d 65 (Wyo. 2015). · cites it 4× “12 and Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-101 et seq. (LexisNexis 20183) concerning the interpretation of certain statutes related to a municipal ordinance referendum? 2.”
Kurpjuweit v. Nw. Dev. Co., 708 P.2d 39 (Wyo. 1985). · cites it 4× “Did the District Court have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the provisions of Wyoming Statutes Section 1-37-101 through 1-37-115 W.S.A. 1977? “3.”
Finley Res., Inc. v. Ep Energy E&P Co., 443 P.3d 838 (Wyo. 2019). · cites it 2× “Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-37-101 through -115 (LexisNexis 2017).”
State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Ommen, 2009 WY 24 (Wyo. 2009). · cites it 2× “[¶24] The Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (Declaratory Judgments Act), Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-101 through § 1-37-115 (LexisNexis 2007), authorizes Wyoming courts to "declare rights, status and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed.”
Black Diamond Energy of Delaware Inc., a Foreign Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 2020 WY 45 (Wyo. 2020). · cites it 2× “Nevertheless, BDED’s complaint under § 30-5-113(a) was improper because the scope of that statutory provision is akin to a declaratory judgment action under Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-37-101 to 1-37-115 (LexisNexis 2019), which can only be brought in administrative matters in limited…”
Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Expl. Co., 861 P.2d 516 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 2× “We agree with appel-lees that this assignment is of no concern in the context of this declaratory judgment action.”
Fraternal Order of Eagles Sheridan Aerie No. 186, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Forwood, 2006 WY 4 (Wyo. 2006). · cites it 2× “Even without the due process argument, of *864 course, the appellants would have standing to challenge the statute under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-101 et seq. (LexisNexis 2005).”
Simons v. Laramie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One, 741 P.2d 1116 (Wyo. 1987). · cites it 4× “This action is brought pursuant to the Wyoming Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, W.S. 1-37-101 et seq., for the purpose of determining whether the penalty provision found in W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.