Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 15.45.110 (2026)

Circulation of petition; prohibitions and penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 15.45.110. Circulation of petition; prohibitions and penalty.
 (a) The petitions may be circulated throughout the state only in person.

 (b) [Repealed, § 92 ch 82 SLA 2000.]
 (c) A circulator may not receive payment or agree to receive payment that is greater than $1 a signature, and a person or an organization may not pay or agree to pay an amount that is greater than $1 a signature, for the collection of signatures on a petition.

 (d) A person or organization may not knowingly pay, offer to pay, or cause to be paid money or other valuable thing to a person to sign or refrain from signing a petition.

 (e) A person or organization that violates (c) or (d) of this section is guilty of a class B misdemeanor.

 (f) In this section,
     (1) “organization” has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900;

     (2) “other valuable thing” has the meaning given in AS 15.56.030(d);

     (3) “person” has the meaning given in AS 11.81.900.




Notes of Decisions
Kevin Meyer, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Alaska & State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Alaskans for Better Elections, 465 P.3d 477 (Alaska 2020). “090 (regarding petition preparation); AS 15.45.110 (regarding circulating petitions for signatures).”
North West Cruiseship Ass'n of Alaska v. State, Off. of Lieutenant Governor, Div. of Elections, 145 P.3d 573 (Alaska 2006). · cites it 2× “AS 15.45.110. . AS 15.45.140. . AS 15.45.”
Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz, 3 P.3d 906 (Alaska 2000). “See AS 15.45.110. If they collect enough signatures the proposition is placed on the ballot.”
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “105; (2) that the person is the only circulator of that petition; (3) that the signatures were made in the circulator’s actual presence; (4) that, to the best of the circulator’s knowledge, the signatures are the signatures of the persons whose names they purport to be; (5)…”
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “105; (2) that the person is the only circulator of that petition; (3) that the signatures were made in the circulator’s actual presence; (4) that, to the best of the circulator’s knowledge, the signatures are the signatures of the persons whose names they purport to be; (5)…”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.45.110(c) — 2 cases
— Alaska Stat. § 15.45.110(d) — 2 cases
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “105; (2) that the person is the only circulator of that petition; (3) that the signatures were made in the circulator’s actual presence; (4) that, to the best of the circulator’s knowledge, the signatures are the signatures of the persons whose names they purport to be; (5)…”
La Quen Naay Elizabeth Med. Crow, Amber Lee, & Kevin Mcgee v. Dir. Carol Beecher, in her Off. Capacity, Lt. Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, in her Off. Capacity, & the State of Alaska, Div. of Elections v. Dr. Arthur Matthias, Phillip Izon, & Jamie R. Donley (Alaska 2025). “105; (2) that the person is the only circulator of that petition; (3) that the signatures were made in the circulator’s actual presence; (4) that, to the best of the circulator’s knowledge, the signatures are the signatures of the persons whose names they purport to be; (5)…”
— Alaska Stat. § 15.45.110(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.