Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 28.35.026 (2026)

[Renumbered as

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 28.35.026. [Renumbered as AS 28.35.320.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1969–2002 · leading case: Speidel v. State, 460 P.2d 77 (Alaska 1969).
Speidel v. State, 460 P.2d 77 (Alaska 1969). · cites it 14× “The indictment alleged a violation of AS 28.35.026. Appellant moved to dismiss the indictment because the statute failed to provide for proof of criminal intent before conviction.”
Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25 (Alaska 1978). · cites it 4× “We rejected the notion that mere inadvertent or unwitting failure to perform a legal duty could constitute a felony: Although an act may have been objectively wrongful, the mind and will of the doer of the act may have been innocent.”
State v. Campbell, 536 P.2d 105 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 4× “There the defendant was convicted of a violation of AS 28.35.026 which provided that one who “refuses or wilfully neglects” (emphasis added) to return a rental automobile pursuant to the terms of the agreement was guilty of a felony.”
State v. Hazelwood, 946 P.2d 875 (Alaska 1997). · cites it 2× “2d at 80 (replacing the negligence threshold of AS 28.35.026 with a recklessness standard).”
Steve v. State, 875 P.2d 110 (Alaska Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Speidel involved a prosecution under former AS 28.35.026, which made it a felony to “willfully neglect” to return a rented car at the end of the rental term.”
Alex v. State, 484 P.2d 677 (Alaska 1971). “It is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will and a consequent ability and duty of the normal individual to choose between good and evil.”
Dobberke v. State, 40 P.3d 1244 (Alaska Ct. App. 2002). “AS 28.35.026. 5 . 966 P.2d 995 (Alaska App.”
State v. G.L.P., 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “025 establishes criminal penalties for fraudulently obtaining a rental vehicle; and AS 28.35.026 sets possible punishments for failure to return a rental vehicle under certain conditions.”
State v. GLP, 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “025 establishes criminal penalties for fraudulently obtaining a rental vehicle; and AS 28.35.026 sets possible punishments for failure to return a rental vehicle under certain conditions.”
Alaska Stat. § 28.35.026(a): 1 case
Speidel v. State, 460 P.2d 77 (Alaska 1969). “The indictment alleged a violation of AS 28.35.026. Appellant moved to dismiss the indictment because the statute failed to provide for proof of criminal intent before conviction.”
Alaska Stat. § 28.35.026(b): 3 cases
Kimoktoak v. State, 584 P.2d 25 (Alaska 1978). “We rejected the notion that mere inadvertent or unwitting failure to perform a legal duty could constitute a felony: Although an act may have been objectively wrongful, the mind and will of the doer of the act may have been innocent.”
Alex v. State, 484 P.2d 677 (Alaska 1971). “It is as universal and persistent in mature systems of law as belief in freedom of the human will and a consequent ability and duty of the normal individual to choose between good and evil.”
State v. Campbell, 536 P.2d 105 (Alaska 1975). “There the defendant was convicted of a violation of AS 28.35.026 which provided that one who “refuses or wilfully neglects” (emphasis added) to return a rental automobile pursuant to the terms of the agreement was guilty of a felony.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.