Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 29.04.010 (2026)

Home rule

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 29.04.010. Home rule.
A home rule municipality is a municipal corporation and political subdivision. It is a city or a borough that has adopted a home rule charter, or it is a unified municipality. A home rule municipality has all legislative powers not prohibited by law or charter.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1995–2018 · leading case: Susan Holz v. Nenana City Pub. Sch. Dist. Terry Bentley Joanne Romero Endil Moore, 347 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2003).
Susan Holz v. Nenana City Pub. Sch. Dist. Terry Bentley Joanne Romero Endil Moore, 347 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2003). “Alaska Stat. § 29.04.010 (“Home Rule”). In Blue , the Alaska Supreme Court held “that a city school district is not a distinct entity, independent of a city.”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Repasky, 34 P.3d 302 (Alaska 2001). · cites it 2× “X, § 11; AS 29.04.010; see also Charter art. III, § 3.”
Stevens v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, 146 P.3d 3 (Alaska Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, in consideration of the Petition for Rehearing filed on July 3, 2006, IT IS ORDERED: The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. Entered at the direction of the court.”
Keane v. Local Boundary Comm'n, 893 P.2d 1239 (Alaska 1995). “" AS 29.04.010; see Alaska Const, art. X, § 11.”
All. of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula Borough, 273 P.3d 1128 (Alaska 2012). “X, § 11; AS 29.04.010; AS 29.04.020; AS 29.04.030.”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley, 435 P.3d 978 (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “6 See AS 29.04.010 : "A home rule municipality is a municipal corporation and political subdivision.”
Malabed v. North Slope Borough, 42 F. Supp. 2d 927 (D. Alaska 1999). “AS 29.04.010. 15 . Dawavendewa v. Salt River Project Agric.”
Price v. Kenai Peninsula Borough, 331 P.3d 356 (Alaska 2014). · cites it 2× “020; AS 29.04.010. 4 . See AS 29.04.010. 5 . We recognize that someday, should it elect to impose a sales tax, the general law city of Kache-mak could be directly affected by Ordinance 2008-28.”
Akers v. State, 389 P.3d 65 (Alaska Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “AS 29.04.010; AS 29.04.030; Stevens v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, 146 P.”
Mun. of Anchorage v. Beezley (Alaska Ct. App. 2018). “6 See AS 29.04.010: “A home rule municipality is a municipal corporation and political subdivision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.