Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130 (2026)
[Renumbered as
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1979–2003 · leading case: State v. Brewer, 932 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).
State v. Brewer, 932 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “See Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130 (12) (1980); Ga.”
Wheeler v. State, 659 P.2d 1241 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “AS 45.55.130(12) defines a security under Alaska law; the statutory definition includes, in relevant part, any “investment contract” or any “investment of money .”
Darnall Kemna & Co., Inc. v. Heppinstall, 851 P.2d 73 (Alaska 1993). “However AS 45.55.130(2) 5 excludes from its definition of “agent” anyone who “represents an issuer in effecting transactions.”
State v. Strane, 61 P.3d 1284 (Alaska 2003). “4 (quoting AS 45.55.130 and discussing pertinent federal law).”
Am. Gold & Diamond Corp. v. Kirkpatrick, 678 P.2d 1343 (Alaska 1984). “Another promoter testified: Basically that it was set up as a — to help a lot of these people that are going to be territorial distributors or that are territorial distributors, are not knowledgeable on how to market their goods and set up to consult them on ways and means to…”
Brown v. Ward, 593 P.2d 247 (Alaska 1979). “In short, the twenty-year exemption should be viewed by the Natives as an experiment which will be stopped if it is abused." 1975 U.”
Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com. & Econ. Dev., Div. of Banking, Sec. & Corporations, 793 P.2d 1048 (Alaska 1990). “Based on the foregoing evidence, the hearing officer concluded that the promissory notes executed by Thompson and Drew were “securities” within the meaning of AS 45.55.130(12). He also concluded that by misrepresenting and failing to disclose material facts to Drew and Thompson,…”
Kinney v. State, 927 P.2d 1289 (Alaska Ct. App. 1996). “The State alleged that Hentzner’s fund-raising effort constituted the offering of a “security” (more specifically, an “investment contract”) under AS 45.55.130(12) [now, AS 45.55.990(12) ].”
Caucus Distributors v. DEPT. OF Com., 793 P.2d 1048 (Alaska 1990). “Far from finding no compelling reasons for disregarding the plain language of the statute, I find compelling reasons for adhering to it.”
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130(1): 1 case
Brown v. Ward, 593 P.2d 247 (Alaska 1979). “In short, the twenty-year exemption should be viewed by the Natives as an experiment which will be stopped if it is abused." 1975 U.”
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130(12): 5 cases
Wheeler v. State, 659 P.2d 1241 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “AS 45.55.130(12) defines a security under Alaska law; the statutory definition includes, in relevant part, any “investment contract” or any “investment of money .”
Am. Gold & Diamond Corp. v. Kirkpatrick, 678 P.2d 1343 (Alaska 1984). “Another promoter testified: Basically that it was set up as a — to help a lot of these people that are going to be territorial distributors or that are territorial distributors, are not knowledgeable on how to market their goods and set up to consult them on ways and means to…”
Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com. & Econ. Dev., Div. of Banking, Sec. & Corporations, 793 P.2d 1048 (Alaska 1990). “Based on the foregoing evidence, the hearing officer concluded that the promissory notes executed by Thompson and Drew were “securities” within the meaning of AS 45.55.130(12). He also concluded that by misrepresenting and failing to disclose material facts to Drew and Thompson,…”
Kinney v. State, 927 P.2d 1289 (Alaska Ct. App. 1996). “The State alleged that Hentzner’s fund-raising effort constituted the offering of a “security” (more specifically, an “investment contract”) under AS 45.55.130(12) [now, AS 45.55.990(12) ].”
Caucus Distributors v. DEPT. OF Com., 793 P.2d 1048 (Alaska 1990). “Far from finding no compelling reasons for disregarding the plain language of the statute, I find compelling reasons for adhering to it.”
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130(2): 1 case
Darnall Kemna & Co., Inc. v. Heppinstall, 851 P.2d 73 (Alaska 1993). “However AS 45.55.130(2) 5 excludes from its definition of “agent” anyone who “represents an issuer in effecting transactions.”
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130(3): 1 case
Darnall Kemna & Co., Inc. v. Heppinstall, 851 P.2d 73 (Alaska 1993). “However AS 45.55.130(2) 5 excludes from its definition of “agent” anyone who “represents an issuer in effecting transactions.”
Alaska Stat. § 45.55.130(7): 1 case
Darnall Kemna & Co., Inc. v. Heppinstall, 851 P.2d 73 (Alaska 1993). “However AS 45.55.130(2) 5 excludes from its definition of “agent” anyone who “represents an issuer in effecting transactions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.