25-1306. Procedure to contest validity or enforcement of registered support order
A. A nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this state shall request a hearing within the time required by section 25-1305. The nonregistering party may seek to vacate the registration, to assert any defense to an allegation of noncompliance with the registered order or to contest the remedies being sought or the amount of any alleged arrearages pursuant to section 25-1307.
B. If the nonregistering party fails to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order in a timely manner, the order is confirmed by operation of law.
C. If a nonregistering party requests a hearing to contest the validity or enforcement of the registered support order, the registering tribunal shall schedule the matter for a hearing and give notice to the parties by first class mail of the date, time and place of the hearing.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2012–2022 · leading case:
Glover v. Glover, 289 P.3d 12 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
Glover v. Glover, 289 P.3d 12 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 25-1306(B). Confirmation precludes any challenge to the order on a basis that could have been asserted at the time of registration.”
ades/taylor v. Pandola, 382 P.3d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 12× “§§ 25-1201 to -1362, “[a] nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this state shall request a hearing,” A.R.S. § 25-1306(A), which must be done “within twenty days after the date of mailing or personal service of the…”
Tiffany Taylor v. Thomas Pandola (Ariz. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to § 25-1306, the “matters” that “could have been asserted” to contest the registered order are listed in § 25-1307.”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 25-1306(B) (emphasis added); see also A.”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 25-1306(B) (emphasis added); see also A.”
ades/kaflik v. Freiwald (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
“§§ 25-1305(B)(2), (3); §§ 25-1306(A), (B). ¶13 Here, Father argues that because he was not served the Notice of Registration by the Clerk, he was denied his due process rights to reasonable notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard as required by A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1306(A) — 3 cases
ades/taylor v. Pandola, 382 P.3d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§§ 25-1201 to -1362, “[a] nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this state shall request a hearing,” A.R.S. § 25-1306(A), which must be done “within twenty days after the date of mailing or personal service of the…”
Tiffany Taylor v. Thomas Pandola (Ariz. 2018).
“Pursuant to § 25-1306, the “matters” that “could have been asserted” to contest the registered order are listed in § 25-1307.”
ades/kaflik v. Freiwald (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
“§§ 25-1305(B)(2), (3); §§ 25-1306(A), (B). ¶13 Here, Father argues that because he was not served the Notice of Registration by the Clerk, he was denied his due process rights to reasonable notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard as required by A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1306(B) — 4 cases
Glover v. Glover, 289 P.3d 12 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“A.R.S. § 25-1306(B). Confirmation precludes any challenge to the order on a basis that could have been asserted at the time of registration.”
ades/taylor v. Pandola, 382 P.3d 101 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016).
“§§ 25-1201 to -1362, “[a] nonregistering party seeking to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered support order in this state shall request a hearing,” A.R.S. § 25-1306(A), which must be done “within twenty days after the date of mailing or personal service of the…”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“” A.R.S. § 25-1306(B) (emphasis added); see also A.”
Lagman v. Lagman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“” A.R.S. § 25-1306(B) (emphasis added); see also A.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1306(C) — 1 case
Glover v. Glover, 289 P.3d 12 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
“A.R.S. § 25-1306(B). Confirmation precludes any challenge to the order on a basis that could have been asserted at the time of registration.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.