Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-341 (2026)
Abrogation of alienation of affections action
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The common law cause of action for alienation of affections is abolished.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1958–2014 · leading case: Nelson v. Jacobsen, 669 P.2d 1207 (Utah 1983).
Nelson v. Jacobsen, 669 P.2d 1207 (Utah 1983). “[3] Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 25-341 (Supp. 1982-1983); Cal.”
Hunt v. Hunt, 309 N.W.2d 818 (S.D. 1981). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 25-341 (West Supp.1980-81); Cal.”
Veeder v. Kennedy, 1999 SD 23 (S.D. 1999). “[3] States that have abolished the cause of action for alienation of affections: Alabama, AlaCode § 6-5-331 (1993); Arizona, ArizRevStatAnn § 25-341 (West 1991); Arkansas, ArkCode Ann § 16-118-106 (Michie 1997); California, CalCivCode § 43.”
Wyman v. Wallace, 615 P.2d 452 (Wash. 1980). “6, § 6-5-331 (1977); Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-341 (West Supp. 1979-80); Cal.”
Fundermann v. Mickelson, 304 N.W.2d 790 (Iowa 1981). “Ariz.Rev. Stat.Ann. § 25-341 (West Supp. 1980-81); Cal.”
Russo v. Sutton, 422 S.E.2d 750 (S.C. 1992). “Code § 6-5-331 (1975); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 25-341 (1991); Ark.”
Bearbower v. Merry, 266 N.W.2d 128 (Iowa 1978). “447 (1927); Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 25-341 (Supp.1977-1978); Maine Rev.”
Fitch v. Valentine, 959 So. 2d 1012 (Miss. 2007). “Code § 6-5-331 (1975); Arizona, Ariz.Rev. Stat. § 25-341 (1956); Arkansas, Ark.”
Bland v. Hill, 735 So. 2d 414 (Miss. 1999). “Code § 6-5-331 (1993); Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 25-341 (1991); Ark.Code Ann.”
White v. White, 320 P.2d 702 (Ariz. 1958). “A.R.S. § 25-341 (then 27-815, A. rC.A. 1939) states the grounds for sepa rate maintenance.”
SER Justin S. Golden, Sr. v. Hon. Tod J. Kaufman, Judge, 760 S.E.2d 883 (W. Va. 2014). “207, § 47B (1987); Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 600.”
Cannon v. Miller, 322 S.E.2d 780 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984). “Code § 6-5-331 (1975) (abolished for monetary damages); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 25-341 (Supp. 1984-1985); Cal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.