Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 32-1665 (2026)

Rehearing; judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Any person aggrieved by an order of the board denying a license, approval or certificate and any regulated party who is aggrieved by a disciplinary order of the board may file a motion for rehearing or review pursuant to title 41, chapter 6, article 10.

B. Except as provided in section 41-1092.08, subsection H, final decisions of the board are subject to judicial review pursuant to title 12, chapter 7, article 6.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1966–2017 · leading case: Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966). · cites it 2× “Nursing § 32-1665 32. Naturopathy § 32-1554 33. Minimum Wage Decision § 23-325 34.”

Sarwark v. Thorneycroft, 596 P.2d 1173 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “§ 32-1554; and Nurses, A.R.S. § 32-1665. Moreover, numerous administrative agency decisions are subject to the Administrative Review Act which allows appellate review.”

Meyer v. Campbell, 480 P.2d 22 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). “…§§ 32-1159 and 32-1160 (Contractors); § 32-1453, as amended (Physicians) ; § 32-1554 (Naturopathic Physicians) ; § 32-1665 (Nurses). Other code sections provide for review in accordance with Title 12, Ch. 7, Art. 6: 1 A.R.S. § 32-2195.21 (Cemetery Brokers and Salesmen) ;…”

Minch v. Azbn (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “The Board placed Minch’s license on probation for one year, subject to certain terms and conditions. See A.R.S. § 32-1664(O); see also A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.