Arizona Revised Statutes
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-9101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter may be cited as uniform commercial code secured transactions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012).
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C., 281 P.3d 1028 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). “A.R.S. §§ 47-9101 to -9709 (2005 and Supp.”
Rodney v. Arizona Bank, 836 P.2d 434 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “A.R.S. §§ 47-9101 through 47-9507. Rodney argued that because the note is secured by a deed of trust, Arizona law concerning the perfection of a lien against real property governs perfection of a security interest in the note proceeds.”
Elf Atochem North Am., Inc. v. Celco, Inc., 927 P.2d 355 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996). “See A.R.S. § 47-9101 et seq. The purpose of the chapter is set forth in section 47-9102 which, in relevant part, states: A.”
Connelly v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n ex rel. Benefit of Harborview Mortg. Loan Trust 2005-3 (In re Connelly), 487 B.R. 230 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2013). “ARS §§ 47-9101 through 47-9709. . 15 U.S.”
United States v. Hoffman, 826 P.2d 340 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). “It argues that the recording of the collateral assignments of the Classic deed of trust did not give appellees any secured interest in the Western Palms note and that in the absence of the assignment and recording of the Western Palms note, compliance with Article Nine of our…”
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Lincor Props., 762 P.2d 594 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “§ 33-362, or a security interest pursuant to Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, A.R.S. §§ 47-9101, et seq. (UCC). The parties agree that no triable issues of fact exist.”
Fox v. DriveTime Auto. Grp. Inc. (D. Ariz. 2025). “In 5 Paragraph 31, Plaintiff cites “UCC Article 9,” and “ARS § 47-9101.” (Doc. 1-1 ¶ 31.) 6 A.R.S.”
Dewhirst v. Citibank (Arizona) (In re Contractors Equip. Supply Co.), 861 F.2d 241 (9th Cir. 1988). “Ariz.Rev.Stat. §§ 47-9102(A), (B); see Major’s Furn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.