State v. Lago, 614 A.2d 828 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lago, 614 A.2d 828 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
110 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Davis (connappct, 2015-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 28 Conn. App. 474, 481 , 612 A.2d 123 (taking particular note that defense counsel did not view court’s conduct to be so prejudicial as to warrant objection or motion for new trial), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992).
cited Cited "see" State v. Watts
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Booker, 28 Conn. App. 34, 41-42 , 611 A.2d 878 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 919 , 614 A.2d 826 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S. Ct. 1271 , 122 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Robertson
Conn. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Harris, 28 Conn. App. 474, 479-81 , 612 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992) (no error where trial court rephrased state’s questions after witness failed to answer appropriately).
cited Cited "see" State v. Connelly
Conn. App. Ct. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Booker, 28 Conn. App. 34, 39-40 , 611 A.2d 878 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 919 , 614 A.2d 826 (1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 916 , 113 S. Ct. 1271 , 122 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Patterson
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ephraim, 28 Conn. App. 306 , 309 n.4, 610 A.2d 1320 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 925 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Joyce
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ephraim, 28 Conn. App. 306, 309 , 610 A.2d 1320 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 925 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992); State v. Geisler, 25 Conn. App. 282 , 283-84 n.2, 594 A.2d 985 (1991), aff’d, 222 Conn. 672 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sanchez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Once an inference has been reasonably found, it can be used as the basis for further inference.” (Citations omitted; emphasis in original.) State v. Smith, 36 Conn. App. 483, 487 , 651 A.2d 744 (1994) (reviewing sufficiency of evidence claim in appeal from conspiracy conviction), cert. denied, 233 Conn. 910 , 659 A.2d 184 (1995); see also State v. Estrada, 28 Conn. App. 416, 422 , 612 A.2d 110 (reversing conspiracy to commit murder conviction *120 where “stacking of reasonable inferences” built on weak evidentiary foundation that failed to establish any semblance of defendant’s partici…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Ralph Lago, Sr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
614 A.2d 828
Wesley W. Horton and Robert M. Shields, Jr., in support of the petition., James A. Killen, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published

Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 9, is denied.

Dissent

Berdon, J.,

dissenting. I would grant certification on the following issues: “(a) Where the police have engaged in unnecessarily suggestive procedures, should the legal question of reliability be examined with exceptionally close scrutiny, and should the standard of appellate review of a finding of reliability be de novo under article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution or both?

“(b) Under the appropriate test, was the evidence reliable?

“(c) In the absence of trial court findings on reliability, should a new trial be ordered?”