green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commerce Park Associates, LLC v. Robbins
See Tinaco Plaza, LLC v. Freebob’s, Inc., 74 Conn. App. 760, 767 , 814 A.2d 403 (lease is contract and court must construe it in manner that gives effect to every provision), cert. granted, 263 Conn. 904 , 819 A.2d 840 (2003) (motion to dismiss granted Febru- ary 4, 2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marcisz
(2×)
See State v. Pranckus, 75 Conn. App. 80, 85 , 815 A.2d 678 (defendant found guilty on basis of insufficient evidence has been deprived of constitutional right and would therefore necessarily meet the four prongs of Golding), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 905 , 819 A.2d 840 (2003). that the court’s credibility determination was improper even if that issue were before us properly.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Aggen
See State v. Gibson, 75 Conn. App. 103, 114 , 815 A.2d 172 (noting that limiting instructions often reduce potential prejudice of uncharged misconduct), cert. granted on other grounds, 263 Conn. 906 , 819 A.2d 840 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Papantoniou
See, e.g., State v. Pranckus , 75 Conn. App. 80 , 87-88, 815 A.2d 678 ("[i]t is the [jury's] exclusive province to weigh the conflicting evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 905 , 819 A.2d 840 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JOSEPH R. PRANCKUS III
v.
JOSEPH R. PRANCKUS III
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 25, 2003.
Auden Grogins, special public defender, in support of the petition., Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 75 Conn. App. 80 (AC 21265), is denied.
Auden Grogins, special public defender, in support of the petition. Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 25, 2003