green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wright
See Daniels v. Warden, 28 Conn. App. 64 , 65 n.1, 609 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 924 , 614 A.2d 820 (1992); Practice Book § 60-5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fitzgerald Council v. Com'r of Correction
See, e.g., Milner v. Commissioner of Correction, 63 Conn. App. 726, 734 , 779 A.2d 156 (2001). “[When] no evidence [of cause and prejudice] has been provided [to the habeas court], [the *490 reviewing] court can independently conclude that the petitioner has failed to meet the cause and prejudice test.” Daniels v. Warden, 28 Conn. App. 64, 72 , 609 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 924 , 614 A.2d 820 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hubbard
The defendant took several general exceptions to the rulings made against him, but he failed to inform the trial court of his grounds for the exceptions. “ Tf a defendant . . . wishes to except to a ruling excluding evidence which was objected to only generally, he must avail himself of the provisions of [Practice Book § 288] and state his claim of admissibility. . . ” State v. De Santis, 178 Conn. 534, 540 , 423 A.2d 149 (1979); see also Raino v. Supermarkets General Corporation, 28 Conn. App. 56, 59 , 609 A.2d 1047 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 924 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992); O & G Industries, I…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Raino
v.
Supermarkets General Corporation
v.
Supermarkets General Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
Lori Welch-Rubin, in support of the petition., J. Kevin Golger, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 56, is denied.