green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McCarthy
See State v. Morlo M., 206 Conn. App. 660 , 688–90, 261 A.3d 68 , cert. denied, 339 Conn. 910 , 261 A.3d 745 (2021); State v. Franko, 142 Conn. App. 451, 461 , 64 A.3d 807 , cert. denied, 310 Conn. 901 , 75 A.3d 30 (2013); see also State v. Wideman, 36 Conn. App. 190, 196 , 650 A.2d 571 (1994) (‘‘[t]he state of mind of the victim is a relevant consideration in’’ jury’s evaluation of whether defendant restrained victim ‘‘by the threat of force’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 903 , 653 A.2d 192 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coleman
In addressing a Golding claim, this court “remain[s] free to dispose of the claim by focusing on whichever condition is most relevant in the particular circumstances.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pinnock, 220 Conn. 765, 778 , 601 A.2d 521 (1992); see also State v. Wideman, 36 Conn. App. 190, 204-205 , 650 A.2d 571 (1994), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 903 , 653 A.2d 192 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
John Wideman
v.
John Wideman
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 10, 1995.
Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 190 (AC 13385), is denied.