green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rogers
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 820-21 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (state not required to produce direct numerical evidence of length of gun barrel to support conviction under § 53a-217); see State v. Williams, 231 Conn. 235, 251-52 , 645 A.2d 999 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Perry
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 821 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (testimony that gun not as long as piece of paper shown to witness that was less than twelve inches in length); State v. Gonzalez, 25 Conn. App. 433, 444 , 596 A.2d 443 (1991), aff'd, 222 Conn. 718 , 609 A.2d 1003 (1992) (small caliber gun pulled from defendant’s back pocket).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carter
As a result, we have “no way of divining what evidence the state might have presented to rebut the defendant’s claim of an unconstitutional identification procedure . . . .” State v. Tatum, 219 Conn. 721 , 727 n.11, 595 A.2d 322 (1991); see State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 819-20 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995) (without necessary factual and legal conclusions regarding reliability of out-of-court identification furnished by trial court, court on appeal left to speculate).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hilton
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 809 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pettway
See State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 815 , 654 A.2d 371 , cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995); State v. Leonard, supra, 31 Conn. App. 178 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lewis
See, e.g., State v. Crosby, 36 Conn. App. 805, 820-21 , 654 A.2d 371 (finding piece of paper to show gun was less than twelve inches sufficient), cert. denied, 232 Conn. 921 , 656 A.2d 669 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Rodney Crosby
v.
Rodney Crosby
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 1995.
Susan M. Cormier, in support of the petition., Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 805 (AC 13384), is denied.