CB Com./Hampshire, LLC v. Sec. Mut. Life Ins., 767 A.2d 1211 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
CB Com./Hampshire, LLC v. Sec. Mut. Life Ins., 767 A.2d 1211 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Daddio v. O'Bara (connappct, 2006-08-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Daddio v. O'Bara
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schult v. Schult, [ 241 Conn. 767, 779 , 699 A.2d 134 (1997)] (the guardian ad litem is the representative of the child’s best interests).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Janik v. Janik, 61 Conn. App. 175, 181 , 763 A.2d 65 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 940 , 768 A.2d 949 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Foster v. Foster
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Janik v. Janik, 61 Conn. App. 175, 180 , 763 A.2d 65 (2000) (concluding that “nothing in §§ 46b-3 and 46b-6 authorizes the court to order parties in a custody battle to undergo psychiatric therapy or counseling postjudgment since those provisions apply to pending family matters”), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 940 , 768 A.2d 949 (2001) .
cited Cited "see" Ruggiero v. Ruggiero
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Janik v. Janik, 61 Conn. App. 175, 179 , 763 A.2d 65 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 940 , 768 A.2d 949 (2001); Savage v. Savage, 25 Conn. App. 693, 701 , 596 A.2d 23 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raymond v. Briere
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 46b-6 provides in rele- vant part: ‘‘In any pending family relations matter the court or any judge may cause an investigation to be made with respect to any circumstance of the matter which may be helpful or material or relevant to a proper disposition of the case. . . .’’ (Emphasis added.) Sec- tion 46b-3 (a) provides in relevant part: ‘‘For the pur- poses of any investigation or pretrial conference the judge presiding at any family relations session may employ the services of any . . . physician, psycholo- gist, psychiatrist or family counselor. . . .’’ ‘‘In accor…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lehane v. Murray
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Janik v. Janik, 61 Conn. App. 175, 180 , 763 A.2d 65 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 940 , 768 A.2d 949 (2001); Savage v. Savage, 25 Conn. App. 693 , 700–701, 596 A.2d 23 (1991); cf. Martowska v. White, 149 Conn. App. 314, 323 , 87 A.3d 1201 (2014) (court properly ordered psychological eval- uation for purposes of determining visitation schedule).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CB COMMERCIAL/HAMPSHIRE, LLC
v.
SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 7, 2001.
767 A.2d 1211
Edward T. Krumeich, in support of the petition., Eric M. Gross, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 144 (AC 20986), is denied.