State v. Jones, 769 A.2d 59 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jones, 769 A.2d 59 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Faust (connappct, 2015-11-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Faust
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miller, 59 Conn. App. 406 , 413–14, 757 A.2d 69 (2000) (monitoring store prior to robbery constituted overt act in furtherance of crime), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 942 , 769 A.2d 60 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Brendan C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Miller, 59 Conn. App. 406, 409-10 , 757 A.2d 69 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 942 , 769 A.2d 60 (2001); see also State v. Kosuda, 85 Conn. App. 192, 196 , 856 A.2d 480 (2004) (“one sentence request for Golding review lacks the requisite analysis of its application to the case at hand”).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kerr
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also State v. Miller, 59 Conn. App. 406, 412-14 , 757 A.2d 69 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 942 , 769 A.2d 60 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cabral (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well settled that “a co-conspirator’s [hearsay] statement, made while the conspiracy is ongoing and in furtherance of the conspiracy, is an exception to the hearsay rule and as such, does not violate the confrontation clause.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Couture, 218 Conn. 309, 322 , 589 A.2d 343 (1991); see also State v. Jones, 60 Conn. App. 866, 878 , 761 A.2d 789 (2000), cert. denied, 255 Conn. 942 , 769 A.2d 59 (2001); Conn. Code Evid. § 8-3 (1) (D).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
CHARLES JONES STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JASPER DUDLEY
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 28, 2001.
769 A.2d 59
Cameron Dorman, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 866 (AC 18786/ AC 19057), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 28, 2001