Carpenter v. Comm'r of Corr., 847 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Carpenter v. Comm'r of Corr., 847 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scarfo v. Snow (connappct, 2016-09-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Scarfo v. Snow
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chila v. Stuart , 81 Conn.App. 458 , 464, 840 A.2d 1176 ("[i]t is axiomatic that an action upon a contract or for breach of a contract can be brought and maintained by one who is a party to the contract sued upon" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 917 , 847 A.2d 311 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Adler v. Rosenthal
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chila v. Stuart, 81 Conn. App. 458, 466 , 840 A.2d 1176 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 917 , 847 A.2d 311 (2004). 13 Specifically, the preliminary agreement provided: ‘‘The initial draws will be paid [bi]weekly as money is available, with [the plaintiff] to receive $250,000 annually and [the defendant] to receive $110,000 annually.’’ 14 We observe that the dollar amounts used in the plaintiff’s lost profits calculations, as submitted by him through his testimony, slightly conflict with the dollar amounts submitted in his affidavit of debt, as well as with the dollar amounts stated in …
cited Cited "see" Carpenter v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carpenter v. Commissioner of Correction, 268 Conn. 917 , 847 A.2d 310 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RICHARD T. CARPENTER, JR.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
SC 17155.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 24, 2004.
847 A.2d 310
Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Cynthia M. Barlow, deputy assistant public defender, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 81 Conn. App. 203 (AC 23488), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the petitioner was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition for habeas corpus?”