green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Chemlen
See State v. Ward, 83 Conn.App. 377 , 393-94, 849 A.2d 860 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 902 , 859 A.2d 566 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bicio v. Brewer
See Navin v. Essex Savings Bank, 82 Conn. App. 255, 258-59 , 843 A.2d 679 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 902 , 859 A.2d 563 (2004). “[A] writ of summons is a statutory prerequisite to the commencement of a civil action. . . . [I\t, is an essential element to the validity of the jurisdiction of the court. . . . [T]he writ of summons need not be technically perfect, and need not conform exactly to the form set out in the Practice Book ....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. John M.
See, e.g., State v. Ward, 83 Conn. App. 377, 393 , 849 A.2d 860 , cert, denied, 271 Conn. 902 , 859 A.2d 566 (2004), quoting State v. Butler, 207 Conn. 619, 626 , 543 A.2d 270 (1988) (“ ‘[f]rom early times, it has consistently been held that it rests within the judicial discretion of the trial court whether to admit the impeaching statements where no foundation has been laid’ ”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ROBERT WARD
v.
ROBERT WARD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 8, 2004.
G. Douglas Nash and Christopher Neary, special deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Katz, Norcott.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 377 (AC 23159), is denied.
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.