green
Positive treatment
15.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction
Two .45 caliber bullets hit the victim, killing him, and two other bullets were found in the Jeep.” Id., 619.
examined
Cited "see"
Digital 60 & 80 Merritt, LLC v. Board of Assessment Appeals
(6×)
See State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615, 653 , 852 A.2d 762 (when ‘‘defendant never objected to the court’s admitting [the witness’] testimony into evidence,’’ defendant’s claim that it was improper for court to admit witness’ testimony was unpreserved), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. John O.
(2×)
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615 , 852 A.2d 762 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. NASHEED
(2×)
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lavigne
(2×)
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. THOMAS W.
(2×)
See State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 676-77 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ayuso
(2×)
See State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615, 660-61 , 852 A.2d 762 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004). 10 In Ms rebuttal argument, the prosecutor stated that during Johnson’s testimony describing the defendant’s laser sight on the gun, “there is a point at wMch it’s very chilling—at least, I thought it was chilling in Ms description—and he describes the laser coming up the car onto Ms body, onto Ms face . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Briggs
(2×)
See State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615, 664-66 , 852 A.2d 762 (prosecutor’s comments properly made in response to defense counsel’s closing argument), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dixon
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Jones, 351 Conn. 324, 333 , 330 A.3d 118 (2025); State v. Bermudez, 341 Conn. 233 , 250–52, 267 A.3d 44 (2021); State v. Wilson, 308 Conn. 412 , 430–31, 64 A.3d 91 (2013); see also, e.g., State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615, 640 , 852 A.2d 762 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lamantia
(2×)
It further explained that § 53a-151(a)"applies only to conduct intentionally undertaken to undermine the veracity of the testimony given by a witness." Id., at 672 , 513 A.2d 646 ; see also State v. Coleman , 83 Conn. App. 672 , 678-79, 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S.Ct. 2290 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 686-87 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1050 , 125 S. Ct. 2290 , 161 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Crocker, 83 Conn. App. 615, 627 , 852 A.2d 762 , cert, denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004); Ciak v. *587 United States, 59 F.3d 296, 305-306 (2d Cir. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelly v. Kelly
(2×)
Ed. 2d 921 (1964). “[I]f the reasons given for the continuance do not support *800 any interference with [a] specific constitutional right, the [reviewing] court’s analysis will revolve around whether the trial court abused its discretion.” In re Shaquanna M., 61 Conn. App. 592, 602 , 767 A.2d 155 (2001); see also State v. Coleman, 83 Conn. App. 672, 687 , 851 A.2d 329 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 910 , 859 A.2d 571 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Christopher Coleman
v.
Christopher Coleman
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 2004.
Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 672 (AC 23424), is denied.
[*911] Decided September 15, 2004 Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.