Harris v. Comm'r of Corr., 866 A.2d 1286 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. Comm'r of Corr., 866 A.2d 1286 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
90 citation events (90 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan Servicing (ctd, 2015-02-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan Servicing
D. Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Urban Redevelopment Commission v. Katsetos, 86 Conn.App. 236, 243 [ 860 A.2d 1233 ] (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 919 [ 866 A.2d 1289 ] (2005).
cited Cited "see" Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turner v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 341 , 861 A.2d 522 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 914 , 866 A.2d 1286 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Munson v. Munson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fantasia v. Milford Fastening Systems, 86 Conn. App. 270, 284 , 860 A.2d 779 (2004) (“[a]n articulation is not an opportunity for a trial court to substitute a new decision nor to change the reasoning or basis of a prior decision” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 919 , 866 A.2d 1286 (2005).
cited Cited "see" Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Turner v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 341 , 861 A.2d 522 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 914 , 866 A.2d 1286 (2005).
examined Cited "see" Gomes v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fantasia v. Milford Fastening Systems, 86 Conn. App. 270, 284 , 860 A.2d 779 (2004), cert, denied, 272 Conn. 919 , 866 A.2d 1286 (2005), citing Koper v. Koper, 17 Conn. App. 480, 484 , 553 A.2d 1162 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sosin v. Sosin (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, it is also clear that the trial court’s November 27, 2006 order directing the plaintiff to pay 10 percent interest on the $3,828,081 pursuant to § 37-3a reflected the court’s original intent. 21 It is well established that “a trial court may not alter its initial findings by way of a further articulation . . . .” (Citation omitted.) Eichman v. J & J Building Co., 216 Conn. 443, 458 , 582 A.2d 182 (1990); see also Fantasia v. Milford Fastening Systems, 86 Conn. App. 270, 284 , 860 A.2d 779 (2004) (“[a]n articulation is not an opportunity for a trial court to substitute a new de…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See General Statutes § 31-301 (e).” Jones v. Redding, supra, 296 Conn. 365 ; see also Fantasia v. Milford Fastening Systems, 86 Conn. App. 270, 279 , 860 A.2d 779 (2004) (citing § 31-301 [e] and Practice Book § 60-5 in connection with conclusion that “the board has the statutory authority to remand a case to the commissioner for articulation”), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 919 , 866 A.2d 1286 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leroy K. HARRIS
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 20, 2005.
866 A.2d 1286
Published

Salvatore C. Adamo, special public defender, in support of the petition.

[*1287] Sarah Hanna, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Leroy K. Harris' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 902, 859 A.2d 979 (2004), is denied.