green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
RCN Capital, LLC v. Chicago Title Ins. Co.
Accord- ingly, the relationship between an insurance company and the insured is essentially contractual.’’ (Citation omitted.) Lee v. Duncan, 88 Conn. App. 319, 325 , 870 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 902 , 876 A.2d 12 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Starboard Resources, Inc. v. Henry
See Lee v. Duncan, 88 Conn. App. 319, 324 , 870 A.2d 1 (‘‘[a]n essential factor in an agency relationship is the right of the principal to direct and control the performance of the work by the agent’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 902 , 876 A.2d 12 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of New York Mellon v. Ruttkamp
See Lee v. Duncan , 88 Conn. App. 319 , [ 870 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 902 , 876 A.2d 12 ] (2005)." On September 23, 2015, the defendant filed a memorandum of law in opposition to the plaintiff's January 7, 2015 motion for summary judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elm City Local, CACP v. New Haven
See also, e.g., Con- necticut State Police Union v. Dept. of Public Safety, 86 Conn. App. 686, 690 , 862 A.2d 344 (2004) (submission 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 7 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 9 Elm City Local, CACP v. New Haven that asked ‘‘[w]as the [plaintiff] terminated for just cause’’ and, ‘‘[i]f not, what shall be the remedy consis- tent with the [union] [c]ontract’’ was unrestricted (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 274 Conn. 901 , 876 A.2d 11 (2005). ‘‘We have, however, recognized certain grounds for vacating an award even when the parties have commit-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gillespie
See Milford Trust Co. v. Greenberg, supra, 137 Conn. 279 ; see also RAL Management, Inc., v. Valley View Associates, 88 Conn. App. 430 , 872 A.2d 462 (2005), cert. granted, 274 Conn. 902 , 876 A.2d 12 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mark DANIELS
v.
STATE of Connecticut.
v.
STATE of Connecticut.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 2, 2005.
Published
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn.App. 572, 870 A.2d 1109 (2005), is denied.